Re: theos-talk Mahatmas versus Ascended Masters
Jan 13, 2012 10:21 AM
by M. Sufilight
Dear Daniel and friends
My views are:
I se not that many problems with most of what Govert are saying.
The books by the Ballards could easily be at the library at TS Adyar.
(Of course if there were a demand for them. Or donations of books were given.)
Well, when I reached the following I hesitated immediately...
Society was founded, not only to re-introduce to the west the idea of an Ancient
Wisdom, but also to prepare the world for the coming of a great teacher.
M. Sufilight says:
That was a new one to me. Govert?
Where are the documentation on this claim that the Theosophical Society was founded in 1875 for this reason?
I tend to disagree.
The Society was as I understand it founded so to promote altruism - since this was and still is the main object of the Theosophical Society.
All other ideas - cannot - be important or central in any manner. Since this Society was non-sectarian from its very beginning.
Else we can go and say that the Theosophical Society was founded so that you and I could become Avatars or clairvoyant etc. And anything else of a sectarian choosing.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 6:36 PM
Subject: theos-talk Mahatmas versus Ascended Masters
Govert S. has written the following:
Readers may also want to read what HPB said:
On Pseudo-Theosophy and Pseudo-Adepts
Some food for thoughtful reflection....
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Back to Top]
- Mahatmas versus Ascended Masters
- From: "Daniel" <danielhcaldwell@21P6Hq6dgikXdDR8hZAnrAuyjG-292H8EwWiBkzDD50y0zCE084jEUno8rW6sK7naVFiwjvP4wt4hxs_v8a0VOY0.yahoo.invalid>
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application