[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: theos-talk On Alice Bailey and Blavatsky

Dec 31, 2011 10:16 AM
by MKR

In the final analysis, IMHO, what is important is the conclusions each one
of us come to. Truth is a pathless land.

On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 10:25 AM, proto37 <> wrote:

> **
> On Alice Bailey and Blavatsky
> Here is a link to a critical study on Alice Bailey's writings, or
> mediumship, by Victor Endersby, and Why Bailey is NOT "the same as
> Blavatsky," or the same as Theosophy. 'One of the "sects" sufilight refers
> to. So many jumped on Blavatsky's shirt-tails, and now, in the Night-time
> of the spiritual cycles, long after the "the last-quarter effort," they
> become more predominant, like other night-creatures.
> ><
> "Ninety-nine percent of all spiritual communications are prima facie
> false." Mahatma Letters (paraphrase)

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Back to Top]

Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application