[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Theos-World Re: [bad text]

Feb 14, 2010 05:35 PM
by Cass Silva

Hi Chuck
Seeing we have no recorded evidence of all the planets being in alignment with the Milky Way (which is all the Mayans predicted) we have no way of knowing what, or cannot predict,Âhow or if this event will impact the earth. We have had pole shifts in the past and survived them, we have had ice and mini ice ages, so what I am saying, is not that the earth will be annihlated butÂwhat is causing these climatic changes such as 95 percent of the USA under snow?

We have evidence ofÂislands sinking and evidence of mountains reemerging, and ifÂa chamber was found in the sphinx foot it would suggest that it was constructed to hold somethingÂwhich could have been removed. As Cayce was a christian perhaps the Jesus thing was more about the Christos thing.?

Are there no more clairvoyants left in the TS?


In AgnosticsRefuge@ yahoogroups. com, "HumanCarol" <humanist@> wrote:
> >
> > Unable to correctly attribute material to the correct author, mangummurdock <no_reply@> alleged:
> > 
> > > Richard Dawkins argues in Chap 3 of his book "The Dawkins Delusion" that>>
> > 
> > It is already know that that is a lie.
> > 
> > << "it is more parsimonious to conjure up, say, a `Big Bang singularity' or some other physical concept as yet unknown" to account for the existence of the universe. The word parsimonious is meaningless in context: Whatever it might denote, how could it be measured? But conjure is the right verb, suggesting as it does both misdirection and inattention. Misdirection: The Big Bang singularity does not represent a physical concept, because it cannot be accommodated by a physical theory. It is a point at which physical theories give way. Inattention: The physical concept in which Dawkins has placed his confidence is something that is either infinite and inscrutable, or otherwise unknown. Men have come to faith on the basis of far less. This is, I suppose, not surprising. His atheism notwithstanding, Dawkins believes that he is a "deeply religious man." He simply prefers an alien cult.>>
> > 
> > Why don't you correctly attribute that passage?
> > 
> > Here is the context and a correct citation:
> > 
> > ---begin excerpt---
> > 
> > > >


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Back to Top]

Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application