[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: original teaching or original cheating?

Aug 09, 2009 02:10 AM
by Anand

Theosophical Society is supposed to keep before the world very high standards of morality by it's own example. What right does TS have to preach morality before the world, when it's own structure has big problem which is described by Annie Besant in these words "The existence of a secret body (ES) to rule the outer Society made the constitution of the T.S. a mere farce"
This is not one problem in TS. There are many other huge contradictions. Blasphemy in Mahatma Letter No. 10 denying existence of God, which insults Christianity, Hinduism, Judaism, Islam and many great religions, is another big problem.
Third problem is J. Krishnamurti ridiculed all religions and their great teachers. And yet J. Krishnamurti's teaching is being promoted by leaders of TS Radha Burnier, John Algeo and others. This despite the traditional position of TS that founders of great religions came from the White Lodge, to which Masters of TS belong. There is no consistency in what TS preaches.
Today they arrange lecture in TS on Blavatsky preaching there is a path of occultism. Tomorrow they arrange lecture on J. Krishnamurti telling people there is no path.
Incredible contradictions in speeches and actions of leaders of TS has made TS a bad example before the world. It is necessary to carefully think not just constitution but also what philosophical beliefs we have as TS. Today if somebody asks TS officers a simple question whether God exists or not, one third will say God does not exist, one third will say God exists and one third will say they don't know whether God exists or not. What kind of organization are TS members and officers are running?
Anand Gholap

[Back to Top]

Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application