Re: Compare Anand's & Leadbeater's Words
May 04, 2009 09:42 AM
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "danielhcaldwell" <danielhcaldwell@...> wrote:
> Anand wrote in part:
> Although story of Christ can be used as allegory to explain soul's
> condition....If somebody is saying that Jesus did not exist
> physically, AS WRITTEN IN THE GOSPELS, I DON'T agree with it.
My above sentence can be interpreted in two ways. According to Gospels Jesus existed physically. .
I was here talking about historical existence of Jesus, which Gospels agree with.
I was not talking about historical accuracy of stories about Jesus. I was talking about whether or not Jesus existed in physical body.
Do you understand the difference in two meanings? It is little hard, but try it.
"AS WRITTEN IN THE GOSPELS" has two meanings. One is as written in Gospels that historical Jesus existed.
Another meaning of "AS WRITTEN IN THE GOSPELS" is stories about Jesus "AS WRITTEN IN THE GOSPELS".
[Back to Top]
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application