Re: new member message for old members
May 02, 2009 10:51 AM
Your point can be understood. But you did not say anything about Joe Fulton's words "shut up". Do members have to assume that they can not start a thread with words "shut up", but they can say "shut up" in message body?
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, Eldon B Tucker <write001@...> wrote:
> Here's the message that new subscribers get on theos-talk. It would be good
> to keep it in mind during the discussions.
> One thread that seems to be getting a bit too personal seems to have
> originated in a message of Ananad's where he says that Reed Carson, Katinka
> Hesselink, and Daniel Caldwell were "some of the individuals who did much
> damage to Theosophical movement by their online activities." This is the
> "will you shut up" thread.
> I think it's time for the "will you shut up" thread to itself shut up.
> Let's enact a cease fire on all sides where all the "you're a bad person
> because you did ..." talk stops.
> We can talk about the relative merits of Leadbeater, Crowley, Bailey, Wood,
> Ballard, Hodgson, Barborak, etc. without picking still-living people on the
> list being personally put under the microscope and dissected.
> It would be good if we shifted our attention from the weakness in our
> opponent's position, looking to strike yet another stunning blow, and
> instead look for something interesting, creative, and unrelated to personal
> There's an interesting short piece in the March 2009 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN.
> "Taming the Madness of Crowds" on page 16 talks about hooliganism, about
> "the melees ant international soccer matches are infamous for the intensity
> of violence . . . Social scientists who study hooligan chaso think they have
> fonud a better way to keep the peace . . . Portuguese security adopted the
> researcher' recommendation to institute low-profile, not-aggressive
> tactits--the most visible of which was to leave the riot gear behindfor
> police officers closest to fans . . . [It] did not alienate fans in the same
> way that legions of police in riot gear do. Shows of force . . . tend to
> antagonize crows, especially if police display favoritism, as in the case of
> a 2001 match in Rome when the officers stood by while Italian fanatics
> pelted Mancherster United aficionados with full plastic bottles."
> There are many short pieces of new discoveries, ideas, or approaches that
> appear in popular magazines. Anyone else come across something inseresting?
> ---- Message to new subscribers: ----
> > Welcome.
> > You are now a subscriber to the theos-talk theosophical mailing
> > list.
> > Initially, your membership to the mailing list is moderated. You
> > can lurk and read messages as long as you want.
> > When you are first ready to participate, we would like you to
> > write an introductory message about yourself to the list.
> > Shortly after that message and your first few regular postings to
> > the list, you will likely be removed from moderation and free to
> > post directly to the list.
> > (The purpose of the initial moderation is to make sure that new
> > subscribers wanting to post messages on the list introduce
> > themselves and that their initial postings show they have some
> > interest in theosophical discussions and are not solely
> > interested in totally unrelated materials. We also want to
> > insure that new participants are not solely out to rhetorically
> > beat up everyone in sight because they hate the subject of
> > Theosophy and want to lash out at anyone caring to explore it.)
> > This is not intended to be a role playing site. It is expected
> > that people posting to the list sign their emails or use the same
> > penname consistently, regardless of the email address used in the
> > posting. Pretending to be multiple different people is not
> > allowed and cause for removal.
> > Participants are expected to treat each other respectfully, even
> > when strongly disagreeing on important ideas and issues.
> > Materials posted should have some connection to the theosophical
> > philosophy, or otherwise be of general interest to others on the
> > list. Large volumes of materials that should really belong on
> > lists dedicated to other topics should not be dumped on the list.
> > There is no right answer to any particular question. But there
> > is a right way to ask the question and other ways that can be so
> > objectionable that uproar created upstages the discussion and
> > only harm is caused.
> > If you have any question about how things are running, or
> > complaints to make about other list members, do so directly to
> > the list owner: email@example.com Don't post the
> > complaints directly unless you are very sure that the other
> > person will not be offended.
> > Theosophy is a grand subject and it is a privilege to share a
> > place with friends and other fellow students of its philosophy.
> > Please help make sure this place is a welcome home for sincere
> > and deep inquiry by everyone from all different backgrounds.
> > Finally, note that any decision make by the listowner is final,
> > and not subject to further debate. If a decision is made, for
> > instance, that a particular tread of discussion has gone far
> > enough and should end, you should move on to talking about other
> > things.
> > Thanks again for joining us and happy philosophizing!
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Back to Top]
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application