[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Theos-World Re: Blavatsky on CARNALIZING the central figure of the New Testament

Mar 08, 2009 02:55 PM
by Morten Nymann Olesen

Dear Anand and friends

My views are:

I never said, that I accepted a Christ made Flesh.
Where did you get that idea from?

M. Sufilight

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Anand 
  Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2009 10:39 PM
  Subject: Theos-World Re: Blavatsky on CARNALIZING the central figure of the New Testament

  --- In, "danielhcaldwell" <danielhcaldwell@...> wrote:
  > H.P. Blavatsky wrote in December 1887:
  > . . . true Theosophists will never accept ...a Christ made
  > Flesh. . . .[390]
  > ------------------------------------------------------
  > Quoted from H.P. Blavatsky's COLLECTED WRITINGS, Volume VIII.
  > caps added.
  Compare Daniel's above message with message of other follower of Blavatsky, Morten. He wrote in his message 49429 this and says historical Jesus existed. It shows how two followers of Blavatsky had contradictory ideas and it shows how Blavatsky's writing creates confusion. Below is Morten's message.
  1. H. P. Blavatsky, in Isis Unviled, p. xii:
  "To you," said Jesus to his elect disciples, "it is given to know the mysteries
  of the Kingdom of God, but to them [ the polloi^ ] it is not given; . . .
  therefore speak I to them in parables [or allegories]; because they seeing, see
  not, and hearing, they hear not, neither do they understand." - Gospel
  according to Matthew, xiii. 11, 13.

  There are several examples, where HPB clearly were alluding to the fact that
  Jesus was a historical person. Try H. P. Blavatsky, Isis Unveiled, 1877, vol. I,
  p. xxxviii, 2, 34, 57, 130, 138 etc. etc. And try H. P. Blavatsky, (The
  beginners book) The Key to Theosophy, 1889, p. 47, 49, 71, 72, 79, 81 etc etc..

  Anand Gholap


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


[Back to Top]

Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application