[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Theos-World Re: How can we define consciousness as an essential part of a unified field theory

Feb 28, 2009 10:30 PM
by Leon Maurer

The links below seem to be working fine whether I click on them  
directly or copy and paste them into the browser. Try it again, and  
let me know if there is any trouble connecting.

On Feb 28, 2009, at 2/28/093:45 AM, wrote:

> Leon,
> When I click your hot links I get "Forbidden error 402 Leon Maurer  
> Server Apache blah blah blah". ???
> John
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Leon Maurer" <>
> To:
> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 3:21:18 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada  
> Pacific
> Subject: Theos-World Re: How can we define consciousness as an  
> essential part of a unified field theory
> On Sun Feb 22, 2009 5:34 am ((PST)) "rybo6" os_jbug
> wrote:
>> On Feb 21, 2009, at 10:52 PM, Leon Maurer wrote:
>>>> Leon, it appears to be all magnetics for you.
>>> LM] Right. Once metric spacetime manifests out of the Singularity
>>> (spin momentum representing this latent *physical* Universe) --
>>> there is nothing that isn't electrodynamic in nature -- and thus,
>>> magnetic.
>> Your comments show that it is *not* all magnetics or even
>> electrodynamics for you.
> Maybe it will all clear up is you study the descriptions and
> illustrations at
> All fractal fields are
> fundamentally composed of spinning (spirally vibrating) lines of zero-
> point space in linear motion, and thus, have a magnetic component --
> that is resonant with all other fields at different frequency phase
> orders. This is the root of all harmonics and electrodynamic
> processes on our lowest order physical plane... And is the basis of
> the overall ±gravitational force on the cosmic levels and the strong
> and electro-weak forces on the quantum and classical levels. Note
> that all material forms are fundamentally based on spherical wave
> forms, and NOT on solid straight linear structures -- which only
> occur at the gross atomic and molecular crystalline levels
>> Now you introduce a *something* called Singularity (spin momentum
>> representing this latent *physical* universe)"
> The "singularity of Einstein is the beginning of this physical space-
> time. Since it is located at a single point of the underlying
> unconditioned "absolute" space (0°K) -- it must contain the entire
> potential mass-energy of this physical universe as nonlinear cyclic
> spin, or infinite angular momentum. (This cyclic spin is the basis
> of all subsequent electrodynamic energy fields -- whether in
> hyperspace or metric space.
> At the big bang, the initial field of physical space emanates in a
> three cycle continuous loop (See:
> )
> and (due to the horizontal rotation of this triple cycle loop) it
> radiates centrifugally as a hyperspherical (toroidal) spiral vortex
> triune gravitational field. This is analogous and corresponding to
> the initial field (1st Logos) of cosmogenesis. See 2D and 3D
> diagrams at:
> (Note
> the 4th lowest order "physical" field)
> (This is the 3D version)
> To comprehend how all hyperspherical toroidal fields (at any level of
> frequency/energy phase order) radiate harmonically from any zero-
> point singularity -- starting with cosmogenesis, see:
> (This, incidentally, is the same as the harmonic electromagnetic
> fields surrounding the entire body, the heart, as well as every
> individual cell.)
>> You have left me confused as to what you think the word "all"
>> actually means.
> "All" means the entire hyperphysical cosmos and its lowest (frequency/
> energy phase) order physical spacetime after its third fractal
> involution (when symmetry breaking on the physical plane causes
> precipitation of the fundamental quantum particles as spherical
> standing waves of different fundamental frequency-energies)
>>>> Spirit / spiritual = atmo-magnetics( highest frequency )
>>>> { whatever an "atmo" may or may not be }
>>> LM] The "atmon" (my coined word) is the metaphysical analog of the
>>> electron on the 4th highest frequency phase order (spectrum)
>>> spiritual hyperspace field. ("Spirit", in Sanskrit = "atma".)
>> I'm sorry Leon, your use of word "metaphysical" and "analog" in
>> relation to a "frequency phase, spectrum, spiritual, hyperspace and
>> field". Makes no sense to me.
> Metaphysical means the hyperspace fields (spiritual mental, and
> astral) that surround all material mass-energy fields (of ponderable
> matter). Each field (at any frequency-energy phase order and their
> harmonics) are analogous to each other -- since all energy fields
> that radiate from a zero-point spinergy (or singularity) are
> structurally similar. As Einstein said, their is only one
> fundamental law of energy propagation throughout "total space." (He
> was referring only to the 4th lowest order metric physical space or
> aether, and didn't yet understand the non metric hyperphysical fields
> in the Planck vacuum as well as surrounding all the physical fields
> -- as now considered in superstring/M or QF and holographic paradigm 
> theories).
>>>> Mental = mento-magnetics(lesser intermediate frequency )
>>>> { whatever "mento" may or may not be }
>>> LM] The "menton" is the analog of the electron on the 3rd higher
>>> order mental hyperspace field
>> Sorry, Leon, your rationale makes no sense to me.
> Then study the diagrams above and this one:
> Obviously, the fundamental particle-waves on each hyperspace field
> are "analogous and corresponding" to each other. See the cross
> section of a photon (spherically polarized standing wave) at:
> (Note that it is analogous to the fields of cosmogenesis, as are all
> the higher order sub quantum particles of the higher order fields --
> that I have given different names, "astron", "menton" "atmon" so as
> to distinguish them as well as indicate their structural similarity).
>>>> Astro = astro-magnetics( lesser intermediate frequency )
>>>> { whatever "astro" may or may not be }
>>> LM] The "astron" is the analog of the electron on the 2nd higher
>>> order astral or formative information field
>> Again, I can make no sense of what or where or how any of this stuff
>> relates to our physical universe.
> Check the diagram at:
> And note the similarity of the lower order physical spacetime field
> with the overall Cosmic fields. This is what I mean by "analogous and
> corresonding"
>>>> Material = electromagnetics( lowest frequency )
>>>> { electro as in electron s di-polar charge i.e. + and - }
>>> Yup, the "electron" is the fundamental negative electrically
>>> charged particle (spherical standing wave) on the lowest order
>>> physical/material plane (aether).
>> A wave is a metaphysical pattern, not a physical thing.
> A wave is the cyclic motion (at any frequency) of the aether space on
> the physical plane. Therefore, as pure energy, it is equivalent to
> mass (E-mc^2)... Thus, it is a "physical thing" in itself. That is
> why all information carried by the physical fields (as modulated wave
> interference patterns) are also "physical. Waves are also on the
> higher order hyperphysical planes -- since they also exist as
> frequency-energy vibrations of absolute space.
> Perhaps your confusion comes because you see the universe as solid
> geometries based on Fuller's structural diagrams. Maybe the
> following illustration, may help you see what Fuller actually based
> all his reasoning on. Incidentally, he and I discussed this
> hyperspherical basis of everything back in the 70's when we were
> adjunct teachers at the same technical institute (NYIT).
> Note the relationships between the octahedron and tetrahedron shapes
> as the fields expand fractally.
>>> It's opposite charged mass-energy partner is the "proton".
>> This is the first thing youve stated that actually makes any sense to
>> me and is aggreement with how I understand our physical universe.
>>> (The "photon" being the intermediate fundamental (primary)
>>> spherically polarized (± neutral) particle generated from the
>>> aether at the symmetry breaking after initial inflation on this
>>> plane. See
>>> (At least, that's what my ABC model tells me.;-)
>> Now youve added and "aether" to you convoluted mix.
> The Æther is the total underlying space out of which all the
> fundamental particles precipitate on the physical plane. See
> Einstein's 1920 Leyden lecture on the Æther.
> Here is what Wikipedia says about it:
> "Although hypotheses of the Æther vary somewhat in detail they all
> have certain characteristics in common. Essentially it is considered
> to be a physical medium occupying every point in Space, including
> within material bodies. A second essential feature is that its
> properties gives rise to the electric and magnetic and determines the
> propagation velocity of their effects. Therefore the speed of light
> and all other propagating effects are determined by the physical
> properties of the Æther at the relevant location, analogous to the
> way that gaseous, liquid and solid media affect the propagation of
> sound waves.
> The Æther is considered the over-all reference frame for the Universe
> and thus velocities are all absolute relative to its rest frame.
> Therefore, in this view, any physical consequences of those
> velocities are considered as having an absolute, i. e. real effects."
>> As ususal, I'm left sractching my head as to what it is what in your
>> GUTE.
>> Thanks for trying to clarify for me, once again.
> I hope I've clarified it a bit better. However, since the cosmos
> goes much deeper and further than the physical spacetime (and its
> ponderable matter--energy) that science can observe -- it can get a
> bit complex when fully manifest... Although at the roots -- it's
> unbelievably simple -- since everything is made up of nothing but
> zero-point absolute space stuff.
> This space stuff on our experiential 4th lowest order physical plane
> (Æther) is in varying degrees of cyclic linear motion at all
> frequency-energies (particle-spherical standing waves) between zero
> and infinity -- which are each rooted in spin momentum
> "singularities" (of finite mass-energies) located everywhere.
> Therefore, unconditioned absolute space, that underlies everything,
> can be both *empty* (of form) and *full* of (infinite potential
> energy and information) simultaneously (in each zero-point-instant)
> -- located everywhere in the original "emptiness" at the primal 
> beginning, as well as everywhere in configuration (hyperphysical and
> physical) spacetime on the physical/material plane.
> Thus, the entire cosmos is a hologram -- with all its structural
> information contained in every zero-point-instant -- like the
> structure of all sentient physical beings is contained in the DNA
> hologram located in every cell. Thus, the microcosm is the mirror of
> the macrocosm, and everything can be understood by analogy and
> correspondence (with allowances for indeterminacy at any level, due
> to random acts of individualized zero-point consciousness that
> interfere with each other)
> So, if you still have questions, I'll be happy to try and answer them
> as simply as I can. ;-)
> Best wishes,'
> Leon M
>> Rybo
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> ------------------------------------
> Yahoo! Groups Links

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Back to Top]

Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application