[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Theos-World Can we see Obama as Hitler in Mass Psychosis.

Jan 19, 2009 09:31 PM
by Cass Silva

Frank, in fairness, he hasn't been elected yet so we don't know if he is going to fulfil his promises. If he is part of the ruling elite, as you say, nothing will change, if he has managed to gain power without their support, then change should be immanent. It's a wait and see at the moment


From: Frank Reitemeyer <>
Sent: Tuesday, 20 January, 2009 4:27:16 PM
Subject: Re: Theos-World Can we see Obama as Hitler in Mass Psychosis.

Even worse: was has all this to do with big H??
His constant appeals to reason, compassion, divine laws, peace domestic and international, true brotherhood, truth and justice vs. hypocrisy and lie, idealism vs. materialism are to my humble understanding the direct opposition of mind control.

In fact, with his successful enterprise against the false socialism - that false flag materialism of the reds, the Communards, the Illuminati - and the satanic red civil war and mass murder in Germany, he openly and visibly fighted mind control. 

And everyone of the Germans of that time could hear and see it and therefore believed it. Note, that this was a generation of people quite different of the infantile and shizophrenic generation of today, a comparison, which is much easier to comprehend in Germany, as we can see since 1945 directly what the American system is worth and therefore know, what is going around in the USA. With the difference that in USA the same satanic system works since generations, forcing down adult people in artificial infantility of what in Germany before 1945 was a 12 oder 14 years old school boy. 

So one must understand, that this 95% of the Germans, who followed big H (according to jewish historian Gotz Aly in Der Spiegel) by heart both intellectually and spiritually had a clear mind as opposed to the present generation which seems even under the beast state.

Comparing it with Obama, who has not the people in mind, but secret men behind the curtain and their wallets, who declares more war and who committed on ABC his lie of closing of the torture camps of innocent people, seems a little bit strange from the German standpoint. He cries: Change - but he changes nothing. It's the infamous anglo-saxon CANT, which was so much attacked both by the Scott Carlyle and Blavatsky, where words and deeds are two things. Where in this strange comparision has big H a difference between words and deeds?

Strange paradoxy, it seems, that from the "bad side" of maya things look much clearer as from its "good side".


----- Original Message ----- 
From: adelasie 
To: theos-talk@yahoogro 
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 3:47 AM
Subject: Re: Theos-World Can we see Obama as Hitler in Mass Psychosis.


What does all this have to do with theosophy? 


On 19 Jan 2009 at 20:53, christinaleestemake r wrote:

> Obama's speeches are a mass of mind-control techniques and Neuro-
> Linguistic-Programm ing, or NLP, and they are carefully constructed to
> implant beliefs and perceptions into the mind of the viewer. Click
> here for a description of his psycho-babble, headed An Examination of
> Obama's Use of Hidden Hypnosis Techniques in His Speeches.
> As I keep emphasising, the whole Obama circus is an exercise in mass
> mind control and it has been so successful because so many people
> live their lives in a permanent state of trance. All of which brings
> me to the parallels with Nazi Germany, fascist Italy and similar
> regimes throughout history.
> Obama may not look like Hitler, nor sound like Hitler, but the themes
> are just the same. Germany was in a terrible state economically and
> militarily in the 1930s in the aftermath of the First World War and
> the reparations inflicted on the country by the Rothschild/Illumina ti-
> controlled Versailles 'Peace' Conference in 1919.
> From amid the chaos came the man that Germans saw then in much the
> same way that so many see Obama today. His name was Adolf Hitler and
> his oratory and rhetoric, again supported by a ritualistic
> presentation founded on mind-control techniques, made him appear to
> be the German 'messiah', the German Obama.
> Hitler promised 'change', 'hope' and something to 'believe in' amidst
> the consequences of war and financial collapse. He spoke to vast
> rallies of adoring followers and a mass movement emerged in support
> of Hitler's vision of a new tomorrow.
> As the writer Webster Tarpley points out, fascism in its true sense
> is not just a Police State imposed by a tiny hierarchy. It might end
> up like that, but first it is brought to power by a mass movement
> from within the people who have no understanding of what the
> 'change', hope' and 'believe' they are being offered really means.
> They just know that they want some because, as with Obama, they make
> it mean what they want it to mean. Only later do they see, to their
> horror, what they have signed up for.
> Obama's America ...
> ... Hitler's Germany.
> There may seem to be a world of difference, but the techniques are
> just the same.
> Obama is far more dangerous than Bush because he can sell a line to
> those who are in the trance while Boy Bush could not do that on
> anything like the same scale. Bush was a transparent idiot with no
> communication skills who needed massive fraud at the polls to get him
> officially 'elected'. He could never be the figurehead to inspire a
> mass movement of the people to support some vacuous 'hope', 'change'
> and 'believe' when they don't even know what those words are supposed
> to mean.
> But Obama clearly can, because he has.
> One of 'his' (his controllers' ) prime targets are the young, just as
> they were with the Nazis and the Hitler Youth Movement. If you think
> this parallel is far-fetched then have a look at this video to see
> how extreme Obama worship has already become for some young people.
> Hitler Youth was just the same. Click here to watch ...
> In line with this theme, the WorldNetDaily website reported:
> 'The official website of President-Elect Barack Obama,,
> originally announced that Obama would "require" all middle school
> through college students to participate in community service
> programs; but after a flurry of blogs protested children being
> drafted into Obama's proposed youth corps, the website's wording was
> softened.
> Originally, under the tab "America Serves", read,
> "President-Elect Obama will expand national service programs like
> AmeriCorps and Peace Corps and will create a new Classroom Corps to
> help teachers in under served schools, as well as a new Health Corps,
> Clean Energy Corps, and Veterans Corps.
> "Obama will call on citizens of all ages to serve America, by
> developing a plan to require 50 hours of community service in middle
> school and high school and 100 hours of community service in college
> every year," the site announced.'
> For the full story, click here ...
> Obama said in a speech in July 2008 in Colorado Springs that he
> wanted to see a 'civilian national security force' that would be as
> powerful and well-funded as the Marines, Navy and Air Force. As
> Joseph Farah, founder of WorldNetDaily, wrote:
> 'If we're going to create some kind of national police force as big,
> powerful and well funded as our combined U.S. military forces, isn't
> this rather a big deal? I thought Democrats generally believed the
> U.S. spent too much on the military.
> How is it possible their candidate is seeking to create some kind of
> massive but secret national police force that will be even bigger
> than the Army, Navy, Marines and Air Force put together? Is Obama
> serious about creating some kind of domestic security force bigger
> and more expensive than that? If not, why did he say it? What did he
> mean?'
> Obama meant, amid the flowery words, that he's not in favour of
> either peace or freedom. He is a front-man demagogue for the same
> force that controlled Boy Bush, Clinton, Father Bush, Reagan, Carter,
> ad infinitum; but the difference is that he has been hyped to such
> hysterical proportions that he will be allowed to get away with far
> more than they were, at least until reality dawns on the mass ranks
> of his hypnotised supporters. And, clearly, that could take some time.
> The cabal will be anxious to squeeze every minute from Obama's
> honeymoon period and we can expect to see events move quickly after
> his inauguration in January.
> When I was a journalist 30 years ago, I came across a technique that
> some tabloid newspaper reporters would use to get someone to speak
> with them. They would work in pairs with the first one knocking on
> the door of some distressed family who didn't want to talk with the
> media. He would tell them he was from a newspaper he didn't really
> work for and treat them with aggression and contempt to make them
> even more upset.
> He would then leave and his colleague would knock on the door, tell
> them the real newspaper he was from, and act like Mr. Nice Guy. He
> would say that he understood completely how upsetting the other man
> must have been, but 'if you will only speak to me exclusively I will
> make sure that the other man, nor anyone like him, won't bother you
> again'. They usually agreed and the scam was complete.
> Much the same thing is happening with regard to Bush and Obama. The
> Neoconservative 'Republican' wing of the Illuminati controlled Bush
> for eight years and led the country into foreign wars and financial
> chaos (bad guy/problem) ; now the 'Democratic' wing, led by the
> infamous Zbigniew Brzezinski, has brought forth the 'saviour', Barack
> Obama, to lead us into the sunshine with 'hope' and 'change' (good
> guy/solution) .
> Hence even some more aware people say: 'At least he's not Bush'.
> Apart from the unspecified 'hope, 'change' and 'believe', few have
> any idea what Obama's policies will be. Public perception comes from
> having an 'image' of him, or a self-projection, not the fine print
> because Obama doesn't do fine print until the votes are cast and even
> then he will hide it in his windbag words.
> There is an 'image' that Obama is against war, but no he's not. He
> says he's against the invasion of Iraq, though we'll see what he does
> about that in office. How can a man calling for more troops,
> including European troops, to be sent to Afghanistan be against war?
> He has also said he is prepared to bomb Pakistan and use military
> force to stop Iran building nuclear weapons and he has appointed
> Hillary 'Let's bomb 'em' Clinton (Bilderberg Group, Trilateral
> Commission, Council on Foreign Relations) as Secretary of State and
> re-appointed Bush's 'Let's bomb 'em' Secretary of Defense, Robert
> Gates (Bilderberg Group, Council on Foreign Relations). So that's the
> 'change we can believe in', then.
> Obama isn't against war at all and, if his controllers have their
> way, he will engage the US in even more foreign conflicts with the
> troops sent to their deaths, and the deaths of their targets, on a
> wave of oratory from the dark suit with the black face who would
> never go where he's sending them.
> He claims to be a 'uniter', which is exactly what Bush said about
> himself before he came to office, but unity in and of itself is not
> the issue. Nazi Germany had unity in the early years of the war, but
> was that a good thing? What matters is what the unity is designed to
> achieve and Obama's much-vaunted 'unity' is to 'inspire' a mass
> movement to support the Orwellian plans of the Illuminati.
> His constant rhetoric about 'bringing people together' can be used to
> justify the 'coming together' of the United States, Canada and Mexico
> in the North American Union; it can be used to concede America's
> sovereignty to the 'coming together' of the 'world community' (world
> dictatorship) ; it can be used to unite the believers in their
> opposition and condemnation of non-believers, which is precisely what
> happened in Nazi Germany with the book-burning and violent
> suppression of those who challenged the Hitler regime.
> The potential of Obama Mania is endless when it comes to selling
> fascism as 'hope, change', 'freedom' and a 'New America', or 'New
> World' [Order].
> Bush and Cheney were transparent warmongers and would always have
> struggled to bring in the draft, the compulsory enlistment of people
> into the military against their will. But it would not be as
> difficult for Obama in the current climate. For goodness sake, he's
> already talking about compulsory community service for middle school,
> high school and college students and creating a peoples' army in
> America.
> That's why I say Obama is far more dangerous to freedom than Bush. In
> the last eight years Bush could only get part of the way to fascism -
> Obama has the potential to finish the job, for all the reasons I have
> mentioned and more.
> You only have to look at the cabal behind Obama, and those he has
> already appointed to his administration team, to see what his
> 'change' is truly planned to be. His mentor, svengali and main
> controller is Zbigniew Brzezinski, Jimmy Carter's National Security
> Advisor, and the co-founder, with David Rockefeller, of the
> Illuminati's Trilateral Commission.
> Brzezinski has admitted publicly that he began to fund and train what
> he would call today 'terrorists' in Afghanistan to oppose the Soviet-
> controlled government in the capital, Kabul, in the late 1970s. The
> idea, he said, was to entice the Soviet Union to invade Afghanistan
> to protect the Kabul regime and thus give the rival superpower 'their
> Vietnam'. The plan worked at the cost of a million Afghan lives
> during the Soviet occupation from 1979 to 1989, a consequence that
> troubles Brzezinski not at all.
> Brzezinski's 'freedom fighters' would become known as the
> 'Mujahideen' and later the Taliban and what is claimed to be 'Al-
> Qaeda'. This is the man behind 'anti-war', Barack Obama. It was
> common knowledge that President Carter would do nothing involving
> foreign policy without the okay from Brzezinski, the co-founder of
> the Trilateral Commission which chose Carter for president.
> It is one of many great ironies of the Obama presidency that he is
> demanding massive troop reinforcements to be sent to Afghanistan to
> fight the Taliban terrorists who were initially armed, trained and
> organised by Brzezinski, the man behind Obama. As Morpheus says in
> The Matrix: 'Fate, it seems, is not without its sense of irony'.
> But then, in Brzezinski's case, it is not 'fate', but cold
> calculation that has brought it all about. The Poland-born Brzezinski
> has a fierce hatred of Russia and that is still one of his key
> targets, together with China.
> And if they are Brzezinski's targets, they are Obama's targets.
> The Trilateral Commission and the wider Brzezinski network, including
> Illuminati fronts like the Ford Foundation, have now chosen Obama and
> the situation will be the same. Brzezinski will call the shots;
> Obama's job is simply to sell them to the people. This is rather
> alarming when you think that Brzezinski wants to trigger a war
> involving Russia and China. 'Obama's' policies come straight from
> Brzezinski's books. Here is one Brzezinski quote you might recognise
> and it was made before Obama ran for president:
> 'Needed social reassessment ... can be encouraged by deliberate civic
> education that stresses the notion of service to a higher cause than
> oneself. As some have occasionally urged, a major step in that
> direction would be the adoption of an obligatory period of national
> service for every young adult, perhaps involving a variety of
> congressionally approved domestic or foreign good works.'
> Now where have I heard that before?
> As an Illuminati operative, Brzezinski's aim is to create a world
> government, central bank, currency and army - a global dictatorship -
> underpinned by a microchipped population connected to a global
> computer/satellite system. He wrote a book in 1970, Between Two Ages:
> America's Role in the Technetronic Era, in which he described the
> global society that he and the Illuminati seek to impose:
> 'The technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more
> controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite,
> unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to
> assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain
> up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal
> information about the citizen. These files will be subject to
> instantaneous retrieval by the authorities. '
> He also said in the same book nearly 40 years ago:
> 'Today we are again witnessing the emergence of transnational
> elites ... [Whose] ties cut across national boundaries ... It is
> likely that before long the social elites of most of the more
> advanced countries will be highly internationalist or globalist in
> spirit and outlook ... The nation-state is gradually yielding its
> sovereignty ... Further progress will require greater American
> sacrifices. More intensive efforts to shape a new world monetary
> structure will have to be undertaken, with some consequent risk to
> the present relatively favorable American position.'
> And what does his puppet, Obama, now say that Americans have to do to
> bring about 'change'? 'Make sacrifices'. As Mrs. Demagogue, Michelle,
> said:
> 'We need a different leadership because our souls are broken. We need
> to be inspired ... to make the sacrifices that are needed to push us
> to a different place.'
> You can bet that this will include sacrificing more sovereignty and
> freedom on the road to the global dictatorship described by
> Brzezinski for decades.
> Brzezinski's son, Mark, was an 'advisor' to the Obama campaign (doing
> what his father told him) and, in line with the American one-party-
> state, his other son, Ian, was foreign policy advisor to the McCain
> campaign (doing what his father told him). His daughter, the Obama-
> supporting Mika Brzezinski, reported the campaign for MSNBC
> television.
> Obama has been the chosen one for a long time, a fact known only to a
> few in the deep inner circle, and his relationship with Brzezinski
> almost certainly goes back to the start of the 1980s when he attended
> the Ivy League, and big-time Illuminati, Columbia University where
> Brzezinski was head of the Institute for Communist Affairs. Obama
> simply will not talk in any detail about this period. He has been
> covertly funded and supported ever since by the Trilateral Commission
> and its network of foundations connecting into the Ford Foundation,
> for whom Obama's mother worked.
> And a question: Does anyone really believe that someone, a 'man of
> the people', would simply appear from apparently nowhere to run the
> slickest and best-funded presidential campaign in American history?
> He was chosen long ago by those who wish to enslave the very people
> that Obama says he wants to 'set free'.
> The sources of Obama funding read like a Wall Street Who's Who -
> Goldman Sachs, UBS, Citigroup, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, J.P.
> Morgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, and so on. No wonder he went back on
> his pledge to accept the limitations of public funding for his
> campaign and instead took the no-limit option of 'private' funding.
> And those people are going to support a candidate who does not
> represent their best interests?? Oh please.
> Obama and his seasoned network of professional manipulators, sorry
> his 'campaign team', sold the lie that he had refused to take funding
> from 'lobbyists', those who are paid to ensure that politicians frame
> legislation, or block it, in the interests of their clients.
> But like everything that surrounds Obama, past and present, it's a
> sleight of hand and mouth. They funnelled vast sums of money into the
> Obama accounts through law firms that represent lobbyists and lobby
> groups. It provided 'plausible denial' about funding from lobbyists
> while the money poured in from lobby interests via third parties.
> Then there is the Jewish financier, George Soros, the multi-
> billionaire associate of Brzezinski and closely involved with the
> funding and marketing of Obama. Soros is a former board member of the
> Illuminati's Council on Foreign Relations and funds the European
> Council on Foreign Relations. In short, he is a major insider.
> You can certainly see the Soros/Brzezinski techniques in the Obama
> 'revolution' in the United States. It was the complex and secretive
> network of Soros foundations and organisations, connected to the
> intelligence agencies of the US and Israel, that trained and funded
> students in the Ukraine, Georgia and elsewhere in the art of mass
> protest and overthrowing governments.
> These manufactured protests were sold to the world as 'peoples'
> revolutions' , but it just so happened that when they were over and
> the old regime was removed the new leaders were those waiting in the
> wings all along - the puppets of Soros, Brzezinski and their
> associated networks.
> Obama is just more of the same, a big smile with strings attached,
> and controlled completely by the Illuminati networks that chose him,
> trained him, sold him and provided his record funding. It was they
> who kept his many skeletons under wraps, like the gay sex and crack
> cocaine allegations of Larry Sinclair, and they will continue to do
> so as long as he jumps to their bidding.
> Obama is just another Banksters' moll prostituting himself for fame
> and power, and that's why he supported the grotesque bail-out of the
> banking system and why he will always put their interests before the
> people. His financial advisors are straight from the Wall Street 'A'
> list, including Paul Adolph Volker (Trilateral Commission, Council on
> Foreign Relations, Bilderberg Group), the head of the Federal Reserve
> from 1979 to 1987 and Illuminati to his fingertips.
> Obama has made him head of the Economic Recovery Advisory Board,
> which is dominated by insiders, including its staff director and
> chief economist, Austan Goolsbee, a close Obama associate from the
> University of Chicago. Goolsbee is an initiate of the infamous
> Illuminati Skull and Bones Society at Yale University, which also
> includes Boy and Father Bush. It was Goolsbee who told the Canadian
> government not to worry about Obama's attacks on the economic effects
> of 'free trade' agreements because his words were just to win votes
> in the election campaign.
> Another Wall Street insider, the Zionist Timothy Geithner (Bilderberg
> Group, Trilateral Commission, Council on Foreign Relations), was
> appointed by Obama to be his Treasury Secretary. Geithner was the
> President of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, the most powerful in
> the private 'Federal' Reserve cartel that masquerades as America's
> 'central bank', and he is a former employee of both the Council on
> Foreign Relations and the appalling Kissinger Associates.
> Obama's Treasury team locks into the inner circle around the Zionist
> Robert Rubin, the Director and Senior Counselor of Citigroup, co-
> chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations, and economic advisor to
> Obama. Rubin, a member of the Illuminati Bilderberg Group, was the
> man behind Citigroup's strategy of expanding its risk in debt markets
> which forced it to be rescued by taxpayers' money.
> The very people who caused the financial crisis are being appointed
> by Obama to decide how to respond to it (more taxpayers' money for
> them and their friends).
> Rubin was Treasury Secretary to Bill Clinton and was followed in that
> post by Larry Summers (Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission,
> Council on Foreign Relations) - another insider appointed to Obama's
> team of 'change'. Summers is a fanatical supporter of 'free
> trade' (freedom to exploit) and 'globalisation' (global dictatorship)
> and he wrote a memo in 1991, while chief economist to the World Bank,
> saying that the bank should dump toxic waste in poor countries
> because the costs of the ensuing ill-health and death would be lower.
> When the memo was made public, Brazil's then-Secretary of the
> Environment, Jose Lutzenburger, told Summers:
> 'Your reasoning is perfectly logical but totally insane ... Your
> thoughts [provide] a concrete example of the unbelievable alienation,
> reductionist thinking, social ruthlessness and the arrogant ignorance
> of many conventional 'economists' concerning the nature of the world
> we live in ... If the World Bank keeps you as vice president it will
> lose all credibility. To me it would confirm what I often said ...the
> best thing that could happen would be for the Bank to disappear.'
> Lutzenburger was dismissed shortly after writing this letter while
> the horrific Summers was made US Treasury Secretary by Bill Clinton
> and now he has been appointed to head the National Economic Council
> by Mr. 'change', hope' and 'believe' Obama. It's all a fairy story.
> reported that the Center for American Progress (CAP),
> housed just three blocks from the White House, has become a major
> source for policy initiatives for the Obama Democratic Party. Who
> funds the Center for American Progress? George Soros.
> It is simply the Neocon Project for the New American Century and the
> American Enterprise Institute under another name. Those two
> organisations developed and dictated the Bush policy of war and
> suppression of freedom and the 'CAP' and others like it will do the
> same for Obama. The CAP will fit and Obama will wear it.
> In fact, except in name and rhetoric, there is no difference in theme
> between the regimes of Bush and Obama. Bush policy was dictated
> through Illuminati 'think tanks' and so is Obama's.
> Bush was surrounded by slavish pursuers of Israeli interests and so
> is Obama. Mr. 'Change' has pledged his unquestioning support for
> Israel to the point of 'pass the sick bag' and his vice-president,
> Joe Biden (Bilderberg Group, Council on Foreign Relations), is a
> vehement Zionist who makes a virtue of saying he will support Israel
> in all circumstances.
> Obama has appointed the arch Zionist Rahm Emanuel as his chief of
> staff and another super Zionist Jew, Dennis Ross, to be his Middle
> East Policy advisor. God help the Palestinians. Ross also served in
> the Bill Clinton and Father George Bush administrations. Oh, plenty
> of 'change' there, then.
> Rahm Emanuel, a Chicago-born Congressman, is the son of Benjamin M.
> Emanuel, who was a member of the murderous Jewish terrorist
> organisation, Irgun, which helped to bomb and terrorise Israel into
> existence. The Open Secrets website reports that Emanuel was the top
> House recipient in 2008 for election contributions from 'hedge funds,
> private equity firms and the larger securities/investme nt industry'.
> Emanuel was also appointed by Bill Clinton to the board of the
> mortgage giant Freddie Mac in 2000 and his tenure coincided with a
> stream of scandals and financial irregularities. It famously had to
> be bailed out by the taxpayer amid the sub-prime mortgage debacle.
> Emanuel, like Obama himself, is an asset of the 'Illinois Combine', a
> cross-party network of politicians and business interests that
> conspires to manipulate Chicago politics for their own benefit. Even
> before taking over at the White House Emanuel faced calls for his
> resignation for alleged connections with the Rod Blagojevich scandal.
> In December 2008 Blagojevich, the Illinois governor and associate of
> Obama, was arrested over a conspiracy involving massive corruption
> and moves to sell Obama's Senate seat in Chicago made vacant by his
> election to the presidency. It is yet another example of the
> staggering web on ongoing and infamous corruption in Chicago by the
> very networks that spawned Obama.
> A close friend of Rahm Emanuel is another clone of the Illinois
> Combine, the Zionist, David Axelrod, who ran Obama's election
> campaign and will no doubt be highly influential in the Obama
> administration. Axelrod is a veteran of Chicago politics, one of the
> most corrupt political systems in the world and he worked for many
> Chicago mayors in the 1990s and on Obama's senate campaign in 2004.
> Bill Clinton took his Arkansas cabal to Washington when he became
> president in 1993 and Obama is uploading his Chicago mob and handing
> them key positions of national power and influence. And these guys
> don't take prisoners.
> All of this may be many things, none of them pleasant, but 'change'
> it isn't.
> David Axelrod, Obama's 'narrator' and handler. Click here for a
> background article that needs some reading between the lines ...
> Obama is a monumental fraud who talks a good story, but lives a very
> different one. He won his first political office as a state senator
> in Chicago in 1996, not through the power of his policies, but by
> coldly abusing the electoral process.
> Instead of running against his opponents and letting the people
> decide, he had his cronies challenge hundreds of names on the
> nomination papers of his Democratic primary rivals until they were
> all forced off the ballot by technicalities. He then ran unopposed.
> One of them, Gha-is Askia, says that Obama's behaviour belied his
> image as a champion of the little guy and crusader for voter rights:
> 'Why say you're for a new tomorrow, then do old-style Chicago
> politics to remove legitimate candidates? He talks about honour and
> democracy, but what honour is there in getting rid of every other
> candidate so you can run scot-free? Why not let the people decide?'
> Why? Because he would probably have lost and Obama isn't interested
> in losing by playing fair. He wants to win by any means necessary.
> The only voter-right he's interested in is the right to vote for him.
> He has also used his hatchet-men like Axelrod to employ scandal to
> discredit opponents to ensure his election when the real scandal is
> the truth about Obama himself.
> He is a classically corrupt main-chancer spawned from the Chicago
> political cesspit. His close connections, therefore, to seriously
> dodgy 'businessmen' and fraudsters like the now-jailed slum landlord
> Tony Rezko are exactly what you would expect.
> Rezko, yet another snout in the trough of the Illinois Combine, has
> heavily funded Obama's political career and that of the now-arrested
> Rod Blagojevich, and in return they have supported massive sums being
> paid to Rezko by Chicago taxpayers to run 'public housing'.
> These properties were then allowed to fall into such a state of
> danger and disrepair, including sewage running into kitchen sinks,
> that they were deemed unfit for habitation by the often black poor
> that Obama was supposed to be representing as a Senator. Some
> buildings were so bad they had to be demolished.
> Rezko also secured appointments for his business associates to state
> boards and was eventually indicted for using these connections to
> demand kickbacks from businesses that wanted to do business with the
> state.
> Rezko and Obama toured the $1.6 million mansion in Hyde Park,
> Chicago, which the Obamas bought at $300,000 below the asking price
> in 2005 while the Rezkos purchased the adjoining land at the full
> asking price. Some of this land was later bought by the Obamas. Rezko
> contributed a quarter of a million dollars to Obama's political
> career and served on Obama's Senate campaign finance committee, which
> raised more than $14 million.
> Then there is Obama's close association with the terrorists, William
> Ayers and his wife Bernardine Dohrn. In the late sixties Ayers co-
> founded the terror organisation called the Weather Underground (also
> known as the Weathermen and similar derivatives) and launched a
> campaign of bombing public places like the Pentagon and the Capitol
> Building. Three members were killed making bombs in Greenwich Village.
> In 1970 Ayers was said to have described their philosophy as: 'Kill
> all the rich people. Break up their cars and apartments. Bring the
> revolution home, kill your parents, that's where it's really at ...'
> Mr. Ayers himself comes from the home of 'rich people'.
> Bernardine Dohrn said this about the Charles Manson murders: 'Dig it!
> Manson killed those pigs, then they ate dinner in the same room with
> them, then they shoved a fork into a victim's stomach.''
> William Ayers in 1968.
> On the day of 9/11 he told the New York Times that he didn't regret
> the Weather Underground bombing campaign and believed they didn't do
> enough.
> The case against Ayers and Dohrn was thrown out because of then
> illegal wire-taps and Ayers is now a professor in the College of
> Education at the University of Illinois at Chicago, holding the
> titles of Distinguished Professor of Education and Senior University
> Scholar.
> Ayers recruited Obama to serve as chairman on the $100 million
> Chicago Annenberg Challenge and they worked together for seven years
> handing out grants to the 'educational' projects of people like ...
> William Ayers. They also worked together on another tax-exempt
> foundation, the Woods Fund in Chicago, which awarded grants to
> Obama's own Trinity United Church, home to his controversial pastor,
> Jeremiah Wright.
> Obama's political career was effectively launched in 1995, just after
> he was made chairman of the Annenberg Challenge, at a meeting at the
> Chicago home of ... William Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn. They have
> been connected to his circle ever since if the truth be told.
> The Chicago Annenberg Challenge, run by Obama and Ayers, didn't fund
> schools directly, but instead insisted that they affiliate with
> 'external partners' who were granted the money. These turned out to
> be far-left 'community organisers' so beloved of Bill Ayers and these
> groups included the Association of Community Organizations for Reform
> Now (or Acorn).
> Obama also conducted 'leadership training' seminars with Acorn and
> its members began to become heavily involved in his political
> campaigns. It has also been behind efforts to 'register
> voters' (voters most likely to vote for Obama) and Nevada state
> officials raided Acorn's Las Vegas office after election authorities
> accused the group of submitting multiple voter registrations with
> fake and duplicate names.
> Among the major funders of Acorn ... George Soros.
> Obama even refuses to prove that he was born in the United States and
> thus qualifies to be President. He claims to have been born in
> Hawaii, but his grandmother, half-brother and half-sister in Kenya
> all insist he was born there.
> 'Mr. Clean' Obama has a deeply dirty background, but for now no scale
> of evidence will stop the swooning Obama zombies from believing the
> hype or burst their reality bubble. That is going to take hard
> experience and it could take some time and a lot of disappointment
> before they are released from the clutches of cognitive dissonance
> and have to admit to themselves they have been had.
> It is the same for all the black people who voted for what they
> thought was the first black president when, in truth, he is a man in
> a black mask representing the interests of the white-faced Illuminati
> cabal, the very families and networks that ran the slave trade.
> I don't want to be the bringer of bad news or the thwarter of dreams,
> but honesty demands it. The man is a trickster controlled by
> supertricksters. A sock puppet controlled by bigger sock puppets who
> serve an even greater and darker evil. To his masters, Obama is just
> a means to an end and if it suits them to assassinate him to trigger
> civil war and upheaval in the United States then that is what they
> will do.
> Oh dear Oprah, how will you cope when reality dawns? But, then, will
> it ever??
> 'What? You mean you're not the Lord?'
> I can understand the appeal of Obama because people want him to be
> what he claims to be, but isn't. They are sick of the conflict, the
> corruption, the struggle we call 'life' and they want it all to
> change. But Obama's change is illusory and represents only the
> continued transformation of society in the image envisaged by Orwell.
> We will see some apparently good things announced, like the closing
> of Guantanamo, to give the impression that Obama means what he says.
> But keep your eye on the ball and you'll see how the agenda of the
> global tyranny is introduced under the guise of Obama's 'hope',
> 'change', 'believe', 'sacrifice' and 'coming together'.
> It could take two years, maybe much more, before cognitive dissonance
> (lying to yourself) loses it current grip on the minds of the Obama
> faithful. Until then they will make endless excuses for him (lie to
> themselves) to keep the 'dream' alive.
> But one day they will have to admit, by the power of the evidence
> before them, that they bought a dream and got a nightmare. What a
> pity they can't see the obvious now and save them themselves such
> painful disappointment.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


      Stay connected to the people that matter most with a smarter inbox. Take a look

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Back to Top]

Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application