Jan 10, 2009 04:03 PM
> Paul wrote:
> "I think Emma was more reliable than HPB on
> the issue of the adepts who inspired the original 1875 TS. "
> My answer:
> And we say, that you are very much in error my dear friend.
> Will you telle me why you find Emma more reliable than HPB?
Ghost Land and Art Magic precede Isis Unveiled which echoes those two
books to a remarkable degree. Afterwards, HPB goes off in new
directions while Emma stays within the original doctrinal boundaries
of those two books. If you want the truest picture of an era, go to
sources written during that era rather than those written long
afterwards. I didn't say that Emma was more reliable about anything
other than the Masters behind the *original* TS, and all it takes is
reading Ghost Land to give you a basis for judging that for yourself.
As for the rest of your post, I just resubscribed briefly to share
some information about subjects that had arisen, but don't wish to
argue and will be unsubscribing momentarily. Thanks to Christina for
digging up the relevant information for people to follow up some of
[Back to Top]
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application