Re: TS Adyar's policy or non-policy?
Jan 09, 2009 04:33 PM
by Joseph P. Fulton
--- In email@example.com, "Frank Reitemeyer" <dzyan@...> wrote:
I have a question regarding this first paragraph, it sounds like you
are speaking that the desire for independence was metaphorical.
However, in the Mahatma Letters, there are numerous instances of some
very non-metaphorical statements regarding the British. In perusing
Letter #81 of the ML, there seems to be nothing metaphorical about
what KH is asking Sinnett to do. Is that a metaphor for what? That
looks very much like political operative work. So with evidence of
political work in writing I would ask "so what?" What makes political
work wrong or undesirable?
Regarding the tentative nature of Johnson's statements. That's what I
would expect when someone is suggesting an alternate theory. To state
something as an absolute truth when it may or may not be is unwise.
Wouldn't you agree? Or is HPB and her teachers to be worshipped as
some kind of tin goddess? The 1900 Letter to Besant is very clear on
Thanks for your patience.
> >Honestly, and depending on how you look at it, HPB's mission was very
> political, especially in regards to Indian Independence. From the
> viewpoint of Paul Johnson's book "The Masters Revealed", HPB's mission
> in India, and the identity of the Mahatmas, themselves was political
> in the extreme.
> Joe, HPB has had no political agenda except that each nation is kept
> from foreign rule (Marxism) and is allowed to develop its svabhava
> part of a spiritual republic of free nations. By freedom is meant the
> freedom of the higher self rather than of the lower self. Therefore she
> supported as a private person the nationalist clubs in India and USA
> PJ's theory is possible from outside interpretations in connection
> phantasy. But he fails to proofs his theory and sticks on words like
> be", "should be", "possibly".
> With the same logic you can also claim that Jesus Christ has had a
> agenda, or the Gautama Buddha, while in reality the messengers of
> lodge in dealing with political persons have always universal karma
> and not one person, one party or one nation only.
> I would like to see the alleged spy letter of Blavatsky. As yet no
> appeared for examination. Is no researcher able to get it from the
[Back to Top]
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application