[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Theos-World Re: TS Adyar's policy or non-policy?

Jan 07, 2009 08:34 AM
by Morten Nymann Olesen

My views are:

Radha Burniers argument is not valid, if that was what she said.

I dare say that we do certainly - not - encourage phaedophile behaviour in the Blavatsky-theosophical teachings. And neither do we encourage reading the Bible, - instead the Bhagavad Gita or similar is recommended. Neither do we encourage singing Christian songs in a Christian Church, nor Christian ceremonial magic or wearing the Christian Mitra etc. etc.

Appearntly there are limits to the holy inquistition's own intuitions.
Radha Burnier and others as far as I know disallow the books by Alice A. Bailey being sold.
H. P. Blavatsky would in her time not sell books by the Spiritists and Beverly Randolph in her time. So I find rather the stance to be a matter of strange a TS policy in the heads of the TS leaders.

Radha Burniers argument is not valid, if that was what she said.
I would tell Radha Burnier, that the theosophical teachings given by H. P. Blavatsky are dead against promoting a view in the public that phaedophile behaviour are prevalent and accepted among the leaders in TS. One aught to clearly distance onself to such an behaviour.

C. W. Leadbeater was given the name phaedophile in may 1906. And ONLY three years later in 1909 the TS dogmatics wants us to believe, that the World Teacher of the Age - the Torchbearer of TRTUH - J. Kirshnamurti had appointed none other than than the SAME phaedophile-named to be the one who SINGLEHANDED discovered who he really was. - Sorry, but I call this a rude lie in the face of Master and Blavatsky.

So therefore I would keep recommending: Stop selling books by C. W. Leadbeater and his LLC Church.

I would rather stick to the view, that pharisee's tell people they themselves want to See when they in fact are blind.

I will never ask anyone money for a book by a person who was a disgrace to the TS and the teachings promoted by H. P. Blavatsky.

But by all means do as your conscience pleases you to do.

M. Sufilight

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Konstantin Zaitzev 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 10:40 PM
  Subject: Theos-World Re: TS Adyar's policy or non-policy?

  --- In, "Morten Nymann Olesen" wrote:

  > They cannot choose both mammon and Parabrahm. Certainly not.
  > rather CWL-theosophy or Christian-related theosophy with Messiah in
  > the flesh, and sexual obscurity etc. etc.

  But the idea quoted above is Christian, with that only difference that
  it was somewhat plagiarized by changing God for Parabrahm. So it is
  christianized theosophy.
  One fundamentalist once asked Radha Burnier, why not to prohibit books
  by Leadbeater. She replied that Theosophical Society is different from
  Holy Inquisition.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


[Back to Top]

Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application