Re: Theos-World Questions about ABailey group.
Dec 30, 2008 01:31 PM
There were not Blavatsky mistakes, only the later leaders thought
so!!!!As you can read by yourself in the summary of tibetan work.
They only could notice that her work was not in sequential form.
***Initiation, Human and Solar was intended to bring the fact of the
Hierarchy to public attention. This had been done by H. P. B. by
inference and statement but not in any sequential form. The
Theosophical Society had taught the fact of the  Masters, though
H. P. Blavatsky (in a communication to the Esoteric Section) stated
that she bitterly regretted so doing. This teaching was
misinterpreted by later theosophical leaders and they made certain
basic mistakes. The Masters whom they portrayed were characterized by
an impossible infallibility, because the Masters are themselves
evolving; the teaching given endorsed an engrossing interest in self-
development and an intense focusing upon personal unfoldment and
liberation; the people who were indicated as initiates and senior
disciples were entirely mediocre with no influence outside the
Theosophical Society itself; complete devotion to the Masters was
also emphasized - devotion to their personalities
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Morten Nymann Olesen" <global-
> My views are:
> Yes. Well Alice A. Bailey claimed that she meet him on the inner
level that is.
> Yes. I find Alice A. Baileys Autobiography to very superficial and
non-careful when dealing with Blavatsky's mistakes.
> M. Sufilight
[Back to Top]
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application