[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Does Blavatsky's teaching harm the world?

Dec 09, 2008 03:40 AM
by christinaleestemaker

Christian times are over!!!The fourth race is (mostly) behind us. We 
mostly are the fifth.
The time is now to get the insight in ourselves and not what others 
like to impress us.We need to think for ourselves and not what a 
priest say or whatever.Also we need to come out of the 6 th 
principle, otherwise we never should find our higher minds.
For that HPB was the right indicator.

--- In, "Anand" <AnandGholap@...> wrote:
> "This Subba Row will help you [Sinnett] to learn, though his terms 
> he being an initiated Brahmin and holding to the Brahmanical
> esoteric teaching &#65533;" will be different from those of the 
> Buddhist" terminology". (Letter 60, chronological.)
> "Upasika (Madam B.) and Subba Row, though pupils of the same Master,
> have not followed the same philosophy &#65533;" the one is Buddhist 
and the
> other an Adwaitee." (Letter 120, chronological.)
> These passages perhaps explain incredible confusion which we see in
> Theosophical Society about major ideas. Blavatsky had made many
> anti-God statements, that irritated Christians. As these letters
> suggest, Blavatsky was perhaps following Buddhist terminology, which
> does not recognize existence of God.
> There is very small percentage of humanity which follows Buddhist
> religion. Majority of mankind follows religions which are theist. In
> all major religions like Christianity, Judaism, Islam and Hinduism,
> God is most important and central in their philosophies. Majority of
> mankind follows these religions, in which God is central, and 
> existence of God is considered by them as great sin. Naturally,
> Blavatsky's anti-God Theosophy is rejected and will be rejected by
> humanity. Blavatsky had always been humiliated, ridiculed because of
> her anti-God statements. Theosophy based on Blavatsky's atheist
> terminology won't be accepted by humanity, because people believe in
> philosophies that recognized God as central.
> Annie Besant and C. W. Leadbeater gave Theosophy, which recognizes
> existence of God and they consider God as central. That makes
> Theosophy of Besant-Leadbeater more acceptable to people.
> Problem is both Blavatsky's atheist Theosophy and Leadbeater's 
> Theosophy came from the same Theosophical Society and they both
> considered each other as coworkers and yet there is huge difference 
> terminology they use as well as underlying ideas, according to many
> students. That has caused incredible confusion about position of the
> TS about God.
> I think it is extremely important to understand this situation,
> because it appears that philosophical conflicts which we see in TS 
> caused because of these reasons.
> Theosophical Society's first object is to form nucleus of universal
> brotherhood. If we see condition of the followers of Blavatsky, one
> can see that they fight more than loving one another. Not only they
> fight among themselves, but because of their anti-God philosophy 
> set themselves against people of all religions which believe in God,
> and annoy these followers of other religions. How can this help in
> forming universal brotherhood? And if Blavatsky's writing becomes
> cause of nuisance in the world, is there any point in spreading her
> teaching? 
> Best
> Anand Gholap

[Back to Top]

Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application