Re: Anand: "Scientists have little information about Mars."
Oct 25, 2008 02:13 AM
> In this instance I prefer the scientific understanding of Mars and
> regard Leadbeater's version as unreliable and wrong and a good
> example of what the 1900 KH letter describes as a "misleading mayavic
What proof do you have which proves Leadbeater was wrong? In the
absence of proof if you discard the findings of any clairvoyant, then
it is unscientific. Your position would be more accurate if you say "
I don't have proof of whether such inhabitants exist on Mars or not.
So I can not support or reject Leadbeater's findings about Mars"
[Back to Top]
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application