[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

An Appeal to the "true researcher" in Anand, Part 2

Oct 22, 2008 05:11 PM
by danielhcaldwell

I again quote Anand's words:

Some people reported seeing Master while they received Mahatma
Letters. But I think it was possible for HPB to create a form of the
Master, show that form to people, and MAKING THEM FEEL that Master
had visited them or met them. This I am giving you as one possibility
behind seeing Master physically or astrally.

Just as Blavatsky could materialize letters, perhaps she could also
create a form of the Master, GIVING THE IMPRESSION to concerned
individuals that Master visited them and gave letter.

I know some people here will say that I am stretching my imagination
too much. But, I think, TRUE RESEARCHERS of such phenomena won't deny
such possibilities and will consider seriously before concluding that
REAL Master visited those individuals and handed over letters.

caps added.

Let us now consider a KH letter received in 1886.

Tookaram Tatya in Bombay mailed a letter to Colonel Olcott on June 5, 
1886.  In Tatya's letter, he wrote Olcott about several things and 
also wrote inquiring about Damodar.  When Olcott received the letter 
2 days later at Adyar, Madras, India, he found that the Master KH had 
added a number of comments about Damodar to the letter. 

H.P. Blavatsky was living in Europe at that time.

A photographic reproduction of the letter is given in "Did Madame 
Blavatsky Forge the Mahatma Letters?" by C. Jinarajadasa.

What should we make of this letter?  Should we like Anand think that 
Madame Blavatsky in Europe added the comments while the letter was in 
transit from Bombay to Adyar??


[Back to Top]

Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application