Oct 20, 2008 08:18 PM
by Leon Maurer
On Fri Oct 17, 2008 4:49 am ((PDT)) firstname.lastname@example.org yanniru wrote:
> Very interesting. I never imagined that your fractal concepts might
> apply to compactification.
> I'll have to ponder what you say below.
(See my email of 15 Oct)
> Now the key to my cosmology is that the compactified dimensions
> eventually become particles
> what I call particles of space, that are separate but form a BEC.
> Does that in any way resonate with your ABC model?
How else could fields of space "compact" if they weren't fractal
involutions of the fundamental lines of force that compose the triune
(total space) spherical field of cosmogenesis -- which emanates and
radiates initially out of the cosmic singularity (that is rooted in
eternally infinite Absolute Space)?
How, can "particles of space" be "separate" -- when they are simply
spherical standing wave patterns or knots of that space and
interconnected through the lines of force of the same space (matrix/
manifold) they are composed of?
(Or, do you consider "space" as being nothing in itself?)
Separation of the different particles are only apparent and related
to their differences in frequency/energy levels... With similar
particles being connected through their common zero-points of
origination. The BEC, therefore, can only occur at a temperature of
absolute zero on the physical plane... Which does not refer to the
fields on the higher order astral, mental and spiritual planes that
exist on different dimensions (levels) of overall, primal (or total
space) -- and must have different levels of entropy and
thermodynamics, as well as time and wave functions. These higher
order fields, apparently, can only be BEC's at the their own
particular zero-point thermal levels. However, at their
circumferences they can carry "particularized" formative information
(analogous to the radiant fields on the physical level).
In the ABC *holographic* model, all coenergetic fields, on any level
of Total Space, fractally involve and apparently "compact"
analogously and correspondingly to every other field on every other
level. Thus, each particle on the "physical" plane of cosmogenesis
has its own spiritual, mental, astral and physical field aspects.
Thereby, all structural information of the entire universe, or any
particular or compound form, is contained at every zero-point
singularity field center that is analogous with and corresponds to
the cosmic primal field center. This correspondence applies to all
forms of invisible and visible matter/energy on the analogous lower
order Astral and Physical levels.
Incidentally, none of that is in any way "supernatural" with respect
to the morphogenetic nature of all higher order astral fields that
directly interface (at their adjacent poles) and are
"coenergetic" (phase conjugate adaptive resonant) at their coadunate
circumferences, with the lower order Physical level fields. This
universal coenergetic field interaction process could easily explain
the scientific basis of Sheldrake's morphic field theory of evolution.
Therefore, If your cosmology does not consider those holographic and
electrodynamic conditions, that are analogous and corresponding on
all levels of total space (including physical hyperspace and metric
space) it does not "resonate" with my ABC model.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Leon Maurer <email@example.com>
> Cc: WEDconscious@yahoogroups.com; ; Theory
> <firstname.lastname@example.org>; Quantum Cosmology
> <email@example.com>; ; ;
> firstname.lastname@example.org; ; Theory <email@example.com>; bn-
> study <firstname.lastname@example.org>; email@example.com; theos-
> firstname.lastname@example.org; ; Mind <email@example.com>
> Sent: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 9:06 pm
> Subject: [SPACETIMEandCONSCIOUSNESS] Re: Soul
(snip all previous quotes due to improper line spacing and illegibility)
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Back to Top]
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application