Re: Anand, Why Do you Not Deal with the KH Letter on HPB??
Sep 18, 2008 10:52 AM
Yes your reference to Geoffrey Barborka's book "H.P. Blavatsky, Tibet
and Tulku" is good.
I would suggest that Anand and other interested readers carefully
read and study Mr. Barborka's book so that they will be better
informed on HPB and not naively accept or reject what C.W. Leadbeater
reported concerning T. Subba Row's 1885 view of Madame Blavatsky.
For ordering options, on Mr. Barborka's book, see:
Blavatsky Study Center / Blavatsky Archives
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, Augoeides-222@... wrote:
> Daniel and all,
> Just my personal view. The established rapport that joined the
Master to H.P.B. was for eternity and not enabled to dissolution.
> >>>"We have not abandoned her [HPB]; she is not 'given over
> to chelas.' [as both A.P. Sinnett and T. Subba Row were contending
> the time!!!] She is our direct agent...." <<<
> Citation: Tibet and Tulku, Chapter XVI, Page364:
> " Why, such an extravagant, seemingly useless tirade as contained
in the letter? Because, the hour is near; and that after having
proved what I have to, I will bow myself out from the refined Western
Society and ------ be no more. You may all whistle for the
> (Letter to A. P. Sinnett, March 17, ( the Pythagorean Number)
> Chapter XVI deals with the modes of Avesa (how and in what manner
and degree projection of consciousness and occupancy by the Adept or
Master can take place). My view is this is helpful to understand the
circumstance of Madame Blavatsky.
[Back to Top]
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application