Jesuits and Germany
Aug 23, 2008 11:58 AM
by Frank Reitemeyer
When the lunatic Whiskey drunkard, Freemason and black magican Winston Churchill (he launched an Occult Bureau with sex pervert Aleister Crowley to use dark forces in his war) was contacted by high treason Germans around Stauffenberg (there were also Theosophists in the Stauffenberg conspiracy), asking him, what he would promise to them when they would assassinate Hitler, Churchill exclaimed:
"You must understand that this war is not against Hitler or National Socialism, but against the strength of the German people, which is to be smashed once and for all, regardless of whether it is in the hands of Hitler or a Jesuit priest."
- Emrys Hughes, Winston Churchill - His Career in War and Peace, p. 145, German quote in: Adrian Preissinger, Von Sachsenhausen bis Buchenwald, p. 23.
This is the more interesting when you consider Germany's hard struggle with the Jesuits, whose "Catholic Action" was at its height in 1937-39 and when the German government revealed more and more critical information about them. According to Burkhard Heim, who was clandestine holding down Hitler's table talks, the outbreak of the "hot war" in 1939 crossed Hitler's attempt to clear away the churches which denounced Hitler's politics as neo-paganism (believe in karma and reincarnation, Atlantis, in the old germanic myths, reestablishment of old Thing places, runes, homoeopathy act in 1938, land claims for every citizen, six weeks of holiday for every worker, persecution of lies in the press etc., which all is obviously the opposite of what the churches want).
>From the theosophical world not all Leaders supported the Allies (all lies) and their black propaganda against truth and honesty. At least de Purucker saw Churchill as the key maker of WWII. Even in a public lecture, as is shown by this quote:
"[O]n the eve of World War II, de Purucker made disparaging remarks about Winston Churchill in one of his regular public lectures."
- W. Michael Ashcraft: The Dawn of the New Cycle - Point Loma Theosophists and American Culture, 2002, p.163.
Did Roosevelt, Churchill and Stalin support Jesuitism in their last five minutes?
Is therefore the Holocost the last attempt of satanic Jesuitism to hold the Western Aryans in mass hypnosis?
The most respected German Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ), our "Washington Post", wrote about the assembly of 45 heads of states in Sweden in 2000:
"We witnessed the ceremony of the new civil religion." ("Man wohnte der Feier einer neuen Zivilreligion bei.", FAZ, Jan. 28th 2000, p. 45).
and later on about the same event:
"It was the epiphany (appearance of God) of a soul league... For the Holocaust is in that stylization not knowable as an historical incident, which has a history before and after, but it is becoming an primordial incident seperated from all history. One has it not to explain, but one must explain themselve before it..."
("Es war die Epiphanie [Gotteserscheinung] eines Seelenbuendnisses . Denn der Holocaust wird in dieser Stilisierung nicht als geschichtliches Ereignis kenntlich, das Vor- und Nachgeschichte hat, sondern er wird zu einem von aller Geschichte abgesonderten Urereignis. Man hat es nicht zu erklaeren, sondern man muss sich vor ihm erklaeren .", FAZ, Febr. 14th 2000, p. 49)
Questions to Blavatsky students:
Is the new religion based on truth?
What about their dogmas, temples, priests, witnesses?
Do theosophists regard this new religion as the latest divine revelation?
According to Jerusalem Prof. of history Dan Diner believe in Holocost is a replacement for the believe in the divine.
Is NO religion higher than truth or is one religion - Jesuits using Jews as their puppets - higher than all?
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Back to Top]
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application