[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX] |

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |

Apr 15, 2008 00:02 AM

by Leon Maurer

On Apr 3, 2008, at 4/3/089:41 PM, yanniru@aim.com (Richard Ruguist, PhD) wrote: > Leon, > > For having read most of your posts on several forums plus our > personal correspondence > over several years, I am surprised that I was not aware of your > metric and non-metric > space concept. Two other investigations are coming to similar > conclusions. LM: If you study my previous outlines of the ABC model, you'll see that I've always claimed that; (1) The "spinergy" (angular spin momentum) of the *ubiquitous* 'singularity' (of GRT) is the fundamental non linear (abstract) motional nature of "primal" or Absolute SPACE (Einstein's Aether or 'total space') -- that is the noumenal cause of all fractal involved linear spacetime gravity fields, which in turn -- after symmetry breaking at the lowest order frequency energy phase level of the metric physical spacetime -- generates and empowers (through intermediate ZPF or 'quantum foam') all mass-energy particles and their radiant energy fields. (2) Potential consciousness (awareness, will, qualia, etc,) is a fundamental quality of the pure *non metric* aether, located ubiquitously at the the absolute zero-point center of the "spinergy" origin of every energy field and mass-energy form in *metric* spacetime. (3) All radiant fields, beginning with the gravity fields, are electrodynamic, carry experiential and constructive information as holographic wave interference patterns on their surfaces, and are subject to phase conjugate adaptive resonance processes in the transmission of such information from one field to another, and directly to each non local center of consciousness (pure awareness, will, etc.). (4) In all sentient beings, such field centers of consciousness, located in every cell of the body, are *entangled* with the individual global (self) consciousness, located in the naval center of origin of the highest frequency phase order monadic (triune) hyperspace field that surrounds all localized fractal involved body cell and organ fields -- also in hyperspace... And; (5) All such Higher order hyperspace fields -- that constitute the different levels of mind and memory, as holographic information carrying, storing and transmission media between consciousness and the localized brain, body and sensory systems -- are independent of each other, but interconnected, collectively, with the brain-body's electrochemical processes and their EM fields by means of phase conjugate adaptive resonance processes. > > The first I would like to mention is the work of Hu and Wu, who are > arriving at similar > concepts based on earlier experiments they performed regarding > entanglement. > In mentioning their work, the following quote is instructive: > > "We have proposed in a previous paper that: (1) gravity originates > from the primordial > spin processes in non-spatial and non-temporal pre-spacetime > (nonlocal domain) and is the > macroscopic manifestation of quantum entanglement; and (2) thus, > gravity is nonlocal and > instantaneous which implies that all matters in the universe are > instantaneously > interconnected and many anomalous effects in astronomy such as dark > matter, dark matter, > red shift and Pioneer effect may be resolved from this perspective > (Hu & Wu, 2007b)." > http://cogprints.org/5614/1/ProactiveSpin(NQ).pdf > > This quote sounds quite like your concept of spinergy LM: Not surprising. But, I'm happy to see that some scientists are beginning arrive at it from (and trying to verify it by) an experimental approach. Hu and Wu seem to be on the right track... But their work, if conjoined with my fractal geometric hyperspace mind and memory fields, as holographic information storage and transmission media, may need the kind of higher dimensional superstring physics and mathematics that you might be able to provide. > > The second line of investigation is by Father Jerome http://go.to/QUFD > His approach is similar to your insight/intuition method but > instead relies on revelation. > Still he arrives at an even closer concepts of metric and non- > metric space to yours than Hu&Wu, > but couched in different terminology. He refers to the metric > spacetime as the corporeal dimension > and to the non-metric pre-spacetime as the incorporeal dimension. > His meaning for dimension differs > from the usual. But then it, the incorporeal, is not exactly a > spacetime. A new word is required. > Anyway, his incorporeal dimension is characterized by a seeming BEC > of incorporeal axions, > which are not the axions postulated by Helen Quinn to solve the > parity problem. I think they may be > the closed-strings of 26d string theory. But Father Jerome seems to > disagree. LM: Actually, my insight/intuition was actually triggered into the ABC theory about 35 years ago by the nuclear physicist/engineer, and one of the "Fat Man" A-bomb trigger designers, Dr. P.S.Perchion (a colleague of Bethe and Oppenheimer) who helped me understand the connection between relativity and quantum physics from Bohm's, Pauli's and Shrödinger's points of view, with a touch of Dirac. (Luckily, both of us being also, engineers, he could explain it all in word-images and energy field diagrams rather than equations. ;-) However, the spherical fractal geometry of the hyperspace gravitational fields emanating from fundamental spin momentum came long before that, and was based solely on my direct intuition based on Einstein's relativity -- which had stuck in my mind since I first read his papers and lectures in my teens while staring at and exploring the spiral vortex geometry of my fathers library wallpaper (designed after some spiral-vortical water flow drawings of Da Vinci). It was very easy to visualize that fractal involved spherical image of the fundamental spacetime continuum when I started considering the possible Mobius-Klein geometry of Bohm's "implicate order" linked to Einstein's explanation of the fundamental physical yet immaterial and non metric unified nature of the aether. This aether, BTW, corresponds with my 'absolute' or 'primal' space, and does coincide somewhat with Father Jerome's incorporeal BEC axions. Actually, however, I think that the 'axions' actually are the ubiquitous, physical yet incorporeal ZPE or 'spinergy' sources of the ZPF's (quantum foam) in the planck vacuum, that generates and empowers all the fundamental 'quantum particles,' 'closed strings,' 'standing waves,' or what have you -- of "ponderable matter" (Einstein's words). > > > As you and Hu&Wu also say, his incorporeality has no dimensions > (your terminology) > and all incorporeality is instantly connected. However, I believe > that Father Jerome > would consider gravity as corporeal contrary to Hu&Wu. > > I am not sure where you, Leon, would place gravity. As you may > realize, > my views are based on Izthak Bars' Two-Time physics > http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0802/0802.1947v2.pdf > which implies for me that our universe is embedded in a larger 4d > spacetime > that carries the force of gravity, but not the gauge forces. If > Hu&Wu are correct, > the larger spacetime needs BEC properties for gravity to be > nonlocal & instantaneous. I think that Father Jerome might be somewhat confused about the attributions of "corporeal" and "incorporeal" with respect to gravity. However, since I consider overall spacetime -- in all its non metric metaphysical (spiritual-mental-astral) hyperspace and metric (physical) spacetime permutations -- as gravity fields... And since only a small part of it all pertains to the space of light matter-energy... I consider gravity as being both corporeal and non corporeal. For example the incorporeal part is expanding the Planck vacuum space which, in turn appears to be pushing apart the adjacent corporeal quantum particle space. In my holographic fractal field model -- with all ubiquitous zero- point originating hyperspace and metric space fields being coadunate but not consubstantial, as well as resonantly coenergetic -- there's no need for them to individually have BEC properties, in order to be nonlocal and instantaneous. The BEC property is reserved solely for the aether -- which is a ubiquitous "singularity" that simultaneously exists locally and non locally, or both as one and many that can never be separated, in essence. This, of course would account for the entanglement of non local conscious experience with individualized self reflected consciousness centered within any sentient being, as well as the entanglement between split particles or between different parts of an artificial BEC or superfluid... And could also explain telepathy, distant vision, foresight, and other psi phenomena and parapsychological anomalies. As you may know, in accord with my topological geometric fractal involution model of cosmogenesis, I can only see the light matter and two forms of dark matter -- while being equal mass-energy parts of the overall metric spacetime continuum -- each spinning on entirely different axes of angular momentum, with their vibrational energies propagating at right angle planes to each other in total space.** ** http://members.aol.com/leonmaurer/Chakrafield-spherical-col_3.jpg http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/Fract-Exp-Lt-Dk-matter-text.png Therefore, while they jointly contribute to the overall gravitational field expansion of the Universe -- they would necessarily be chemically and electrodynamically non interactive as well as invisible to each other. Each aspect of matter then, according to this model, would appear to have its own independent if not parallel involution and evolution. This is something we can only speculate about, however -- since their substantial holographic images, as energy fields in various vibrational frequencies and topological configurations, could be likened to two different holograms stored in a transparent solid medium at different angles of incidence, that would require a separate coherent radiation at different angles to reconstruct individually. This is quite possible, when we consider that the holographic fractal geometry of the ABC model indicates that the universe constructs itself, involutionally and evolutionally, in accord with (and can be understood by) analogy and correspondence -- based on information stored as modulated wave interference patterns on electrodynamic field surfaces. Conventional physical science, on the other hand, cannot prove or disprove these aspects of existence -- since it can only deal with observables on its own plane, angle, dimension, surface, or other *metric* (corporeal, ponderable, etc.) state of physical existence. I would hope that we might be able to consolidate all these models in one overall master unified field theory, under an entirely new scientific paradigm, that could, once and for all, solve all the hard problems, and explain all the paradoxes and anomalies of conventional reductive material science. There has to be a correct UFTOE that ultimately closes the explanatory gap between relativity and quantum physics. That QR theory could very well be based on the ABC fractal radiative field model of cosmogenesis. Since it's way too late for me to get a PhD in physics... All I can do now is wait and see when you, or some other accredited physicist (s) can cook up some appropriate mathematics and get published in a major physics journal; a peer reviewed paper covering such an entirely scientifically reasonable, unified field theory of everything -- followed by, or based on some corroborative experimental proof (that might win a Nobel prize. :-) I hope I have enough years left to see it happen in my lifetime. Best wishes, Leon Maurer http://canonizer.com/topic.asp/23/13 http://www.tellworld.com/Astro.Biological.Coenergetics/ > > yanniru > > -----Original Message----- > From: Leon Maurer <leonmaurer@aol.com> > To: MindBrain@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 9:01 pm > Subject: Re: [Mind and Brain] Aether is the empty space on which > the Universe sits > Apparently, there is a misunderstanding of the difference between non > metric (ZPE) "empty space" and metric (ZPF) "spacetime". > > Spaceships (and any other ponderable material forms) can only move > through metric spacetime. Yet zero-point empty space or aether is > real *substance* (which spacetime and all its material permutations > could not exist without) that has no measurable dimensions. > > Unfortunately, meta theoreticians that base everything on the > material neurology and its metrics (along with other materialists and > quantum theorists) -- cannot see the forest for the trees. ;- > (snip) [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application