Theos-Talk Archives (January 2008 Message tt00157)

Hi Nigel,
It makes sense that visions and revelations must be taken with a 
pinch of salt as each person's predispositions colour what is seen.

The assessments here quoted are all taken from one source however, 
that being Blavatsky and the alleged Mahatmas (I say alleged as in my 
opinion it is an act of faith to believe they exist if we have never 
met them and then also have personally confirmed for ourselves the 
accurateness of their visions)

It seems to me that while the visions of those mentioned may not have 
been 100% accurate, we therefore cannot conclude that Blavatsky or 
her Mahatmas observations are any more accurate or reliable and 
simply discard the other teachings as being pure nonsense and 
delusion.

Until we can have our own experience direct we can only speculate on 
who may be or may not be closer to the reality.

Blavatsky's teachings maybe equally as off the mark as the others or 
indeed the others may have come closer to the reality than she did.

Regards,
Perry




--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "nhcareyta" <nhcareyta@...> wrote:
>
> http://www.blavatskyarchives.com/psychicversusinitiate.htm
>