Theos-Talk Archives (January 2008 Message tt00050)

You have not informed yourself well, Cass
HPB speaks about a death planet and that is true , no plant= 
etherical and astral can live on that dead  body of the moon.
It is hard as a sugared sweet. and there are rocks on it, so 
why not a human without high gravity can walk on 
it???????Gravity is very different  than on earth.
You all need to use the facts there are.Before you put 
nonsense in the air.
Christina





--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, Cass Silva 
<silva_cass@...> wrote:
>
> I suppose if the moon is decaying it is still partly 
solid, although I take Frank's interesting point about 
how a solid can land on an etherial object.
>    
>   Cass
> 
> Richard Semock <semockr@...> wrote:
>           I almost believe that the moon is a kama-
rupic phantom as Gottfried 
> says at least thats easier to swallow than green 
cheese. Also, G de 
> P's statement couched as it is in TS lore is easier to 
believe than 
> those dozen or so Apollo missions that landed on that 
phantom tide-
> producing body.
> 
> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Frank 
Reitemeyer" <dzyan@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > 1. "Walking [on the moon] was quite easy!"
> > - Buzz Aldrin, interview by Aron Ranen: "Did We Go?"
> > http://de.youtube.com/
watch?v=R9pQ1gWzs40&feature=related
> > 
> > 
> > 2. "What we see when we look up into the starry 
spaces is the 
> astral body, 
> > the kama-rupa of the physical moon that was, aeons 
and aeons ago, 
> which 
> > physical body is now disintegrated into impalpable 
cosmic dust. We 
> perceive 
> > this kama-rupic phantom, because our physical earth 
is one subplane 
> higher 
> > than that on which the physical body of the moon 
was. Were our 
> scientists by 
> > some magic to be transported to the moon, even 
though they would be 
> able to 
> > see it almost as clearly as they see our earth, I do 
not believe 
> they would 
> > find it easy to walk about on its surface, for it is 
not quite hard 
> enough 
> > for easy walking."
> > 
> > - Gottfried de Purucker in an E.S. lecture in the 
Temple of Peace 
> at Point 
> > Loma around 1927. According to his chela W. Emmett 
Small printed 
> first after 
> > the stenographic report in question- and answer-
form, then in July 
> 1936 as 
> > 12-part "Esoteric Instructions", republished as 12-
part "Esoteric 
> > Teachings", see: http://www.wisdomtraditions.com/
esoterict.html and 
> again in 
> > 1976 new edited as "Fountain-Source of Occultism", 
see: 
> > http://www.theosociety.org/pasadena/fso/
fso7b.htm#moon.
> > 
> > Compare also two diagrams of Helena Blavatsky in her 
"The Secret 
> Doctrine" 
> > about the "Planetary Division" and "The Earth Chain":
> > 
> > Diagram 1 in [[Vol. 1, Page]] 153:
> > http://www.theosociety.org/pasadena/sd/sd1-1-08.htm
> > 
> > Diagram II in [[Vol. 1, Page]] 172:
> > http://www.theosociety.org/pasadena/sd/sd1-1-09.htm
> > 
> > Frank
> >
> 
> 
> 
>                          
> 
>        
> ---------------------------------
> Never miss a thing.   Make Yahoo your homepage.
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>