Theos-Talk Archives (January 2008 Message tt00035)

Frank,
  Thanks, your right! I am dyslexic! I don't think people can make out the more complete picture between Barborka and De Zirkoff and get them transposed in my memory. de Zirkoff was grand nephew of Blavatsky not Barborka. Notwithstanding my dyslexia between them what I posted about Tibet and Tulku I stand by. I think members cannot get a more complete picture of what transpired in Madame Blavatsky's life and what made her what she presented to those who knew her. 

Regards,
John

-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: "Frank Reitemeyer" <dzyan@online.de> 

>It is a real shame so many have not read and deeply studied the contents of 
>Tibet and Tulku by her blood relative Barborka as this is the only solitary 
>work that deals extensively with the matters that made Blavatsky so very 
>unique. Understanding is found in those pages!

John, yes, it is a shame that theosophists do not their homework and study 
our standard literature.
But since when is Barborka a blood relative of Blavatsky???
Frank


 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]