Re: Does theosophy impugn NASA's moon landing in 1969?
Jan 03, 2008 10:28 PM
by Richard Semock
I almost believe that the moon is a kama-rupic phantom as Gottfried
says at least thats easier to swallow than green cheese. Also, G de
P's statement couched as it is in TS lore is easier to believe than
those dozen or so Apollo missions that landed on that phantom tide-
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Frank Reitemeyer" <dzyan@...>
> 1. "Walking [on the moon] was quite easy!"
> - Buzz Aldrin, interview by Aron Ranen: "Did We Go?"
> 2. "What we see when we look up into the starry spaces is the
> the kama-rupa of the physical moon that was, aeons and aeons ago,
> physical body is now disintegrated into impalpable cosmic dust. We
> this kama-rupic phantom, because our physical earth is one subplane
> than that on which the physical body of the moon was. Were our
> some magic to be transported to the moon, even though they would be
> see it almost as clearly as they see our earth, I do not believe
> find it easy to walk about on its surface, for it is not quite hard
> for easy walking."
> - Gottfried de Purucker in an E.S. lecture in the Temple of Peace
> Loma around 1927. According to his chela W. Emmett Small printed
> the stenographic report in question- and answer-form, then in July
> 12-part "Esoteric Instructions", republished as 12-part "Esoteric
> Teachings", see: http://www.wisdomtraditions.com/esoterict.html and
> 1976 new edited as "Fountain-Source of Occultism", see:
> Compare also two diagrams of Helena Blavatsky in her "The Secret
> about the "Planetary Division" and "The Earth Chain":
> Diagram 1 in [[Vol. 1, Page]] 153:
> Diagram II in [[Vol. 1, Page]] 172:
[Back to Top]
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application