[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX] |

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |

Oct 24, 2007 07:49 PM

by Leon Maurer

On Oct 21, 2007, at 10/21/071:06 PM, Ronald C. Blue wrote: > --- In MindBrain@yahoogroups.com, "Chris Lofting" > <chrislofting@...> wrote: > > > > I mentioned this in my last post to MC but I think it needs a little > > fleshing out in the context of current day perspectives. > > >>>Michael Cecil : The problem with all of your writings, as I > understand it, is that they raise the question of whether truth is > really as complicated as you suggest it is. > >>>>>>>>>> > It turns out that Chris Lofting is correct Truth is complicated. > In the enclosed picture what do you see A B C or 12 13 14 what is > the truth. > > Ron Blue > > Yes -- which simply goes to prove that the whole Truth can be seen as either one, the other, or both ways simultaneously... Like looking at the universe both from the inside out and the outside in. Thus, when we try to look outward from the center of the Cosmos, we have to realize that that viewpoint can be everywhere and its circumference, nowhere. But, if we look at the same cosmos from the outside in, that zero-point can only be located at the center of its outermost circumference. Which goes to show that CL and MC may each be more or less right from their own points of view... And, at the same time be totally blind to each other's viewpoint -- which seem to be mutually exclusive. As I see it however, the holographic, fractal involved field Cosmos can be viewed simultaneously from both the center and the circumference -- which accounts for each of us looking outward from the zero-point center of our own spherical universe -- that is simple and complex at the same time, each viewpoint having a different perspective than all the others. Take a look! Use your imagination, extrapolate continued fractal involution's of each inner spherical field, ad infinitum -- then imagine all image information being carried as wave interference patterns on the spherical surfaces of the fields -- and see for yourselves... http://members.aol.com/leonmaurer/Chakrafield-spherical-col_3.jpg BTW, is it a coincidence that the ABC cosmogenesis model has 12, 13, and 14 unified field combinations? :-) Note that all the fractal geometry of the I-Ching that CL bases his IDM theory of meaning on, is rooted in the fractal involution of spherical fields within fields, etc. at the moment of the Big Bang. And, all the ideas about consciousness and creation that MC has, are rooted in the "Omnipresent, Eternal, Boundless, and Immutable Principle" that must underlie the primal Space or "singularity," out of which arises the fractally involved spherical Cosmos, all its structures, along with the infinitely ubiquitous zero-points of potential individual animal sentient or human self consciousness... That, while limited in number, remains always subjectively *identical* to the initial global Cosmic consciousness... While, each such individual "I" remains experientially and self-reflectively *different* (but NOT separate) from all the others. Thus, simplicity/complexity, unity/diversity, absolute/relative, subject/object, yin-yang, creative/receptive, etc., must exist together, simultaneously, in everything -- and phenomenally appear to us as paradoxical... But which, fundamentally, are the natural order of all things. Carl Jung saw all this as "synchronicity." Unfortunately, those who don't bother to think about the essential unity of all dualities and their roots in pre-cosmic fundamental reality, take the easy way out, and attribute such paradoxes to a miraculous "creator" that is personally separate from "his" creations -- or they assume that matter is primal and all there is. This ignorance of the essential unity of all sentient beings, is the real cause of human suffering, as the Buddha pointed out -- who well knew, as did the ancient Chinese master who devised the I-Ching -- the fundamental duality between consciousness and matter, as well as the holographic fractal nature of the primal beginning AND everything that stems from it. Let's see how long it will take before "science" finally catches on and changes its present assumptions and paradigm accordingly? ;-) Leon Maurer [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application