Re: Should an "ideal" Theosophical Society study & "promote" these books?
Jul 19, 2007 05:30 AM
by Pablo Sender
Your post is very interesting to me, and I understand your position,
because it is supported on your experiences. My path was the
opposite. I began knowing quite well the "outsiders "outsiders'
perspectives" to discover almost by chance (I didn't know I would
work in the Archives nor that I went there in other to find out
anything) that those "perspectives" were in many cases inaccurate,
when not malicious.
But you see, this is all my point: here we have two fairly sincere
people (you and me) with different points of view, according to their
experiences, features, etc. Could we work together? Or those
differences in opinions would prevent it? If we could, on what basis?
Should one of them (me, for example) accept the view of the other one
and be in a Society that condemns Leadbeater? Should you accept
Leadbeater and talk good things about him? This situation will always
be present in different issues, unless we build a hard set of
concepts to be accepted by everyone. That is what almost every
institution did in the past and present. I'd like to try something
different. Let's build a Society where people may say respectfully "I
don't agree with this author or personality" and receive as
answer "Ok, let's find out our common ground and work together in the
same direction." I think this is possible.
[Back to Top]
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application