|[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]|
|[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]|
Feb 09, 2007 00:42 AM
by Konstantin Zaitzev
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "nhcareyta" wrote: > Bishop Leadbeater was clearly untruthful or fraudulent in numerous > Both Bishop Leadbeater and Dr Annie Besant have been proven far and > At this stage, the same cannot be said of Blavatsky with any > similar degree of proof. Not exactly. In academic world Blavatsky is regarded as a proven fraud. Even if we dismiss Hodgeson's and Soloviev's accusations, there is acute critic from the orientalists' side. Before their contacts with Blavatsky both Besant and Leadbeater were respected people of good reputation. Leadbeater was a clergyman which had no reclamations as such and Besant was agnostic philosopher active in the social field. After their close association with Blavatsky they became immoral and frauds. Wasn't it she who made in them so significant a change? They claimed themselves pupils of Blavatsky, and in this respect they could be regarded as such.