Re: A Question to Jake
Sep 12, 2006 02:02 PM
by Mark Jaqua
Re: A Question to... Moi!
Yes, Dan, I guess you did mention
some people who HAD seen the full 1900
letter, and kept their opinion regardless.
At the end of the letter in the Eclectic
you refer to is the quote from Editor
Small below - So I guess even the ULT's
Official Position (I know.. they don't
have any!) is a tentative assertion
that the letter is Bona Fide. THIS
ALL IS NOT VERY IMPORTANT. Whether
one accepts the letter or not doesn't
affect basic shared Theosophical Tenets.
It seems the overwhelming majority think
it was a bona fide KH letter regardless.
The end of all logic is CONFUSION.
In between it does some good.
- jake j.
"(the correspondent) is referred to
pages 296-7 of the volume 'The Theosophical
Movement, 1875-1950' issued by the United
Lodge of Theosophists, Los Angeles. The
1900 Letter under the question is therein
quoted, and comment on it seems to express
a 'ULT' tacit endorsement of its bona fides."
(Eclectic # 103, p. 12)
Stay in the know. Pulse on the new Yahoo.com. Check it out.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Back to Top]
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application