[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Bruce on "Daniel and Dallas"

Jul 27, 2006 02:53 PM
by danielhcaldwell


I love the way you know exactly what I was or wasn't thinking or 

Take this gem of yours:

Daniel has baited Dallas into commenting on an historical matter by
again first trying to deceive readers through lack of context. Rather
than demonstrate to readers why Dallas is wrong in his analysis, 
Daniel might demonstrate some courage and present his own 
convictions to the readers. It is rather cowardly sitting in the 
weeds constantly floating decoys and then blasting anyone who cares 
to investigate. Clever but

When I wrote my posting titled "Robert Crosbie Claimed" I wasn't
even thinking about Dallas!!  I had been discussing the use of 
the word "claim" with Carlos.  So I simply decided to present
to Carlos a series of statements showing what Crosby claimed.

So now you say I was baiting Dallas?

But of course you know better than myself what I was or wasn't 
thinking or doing.

Bruce, is this in your code of Theosophical ethics to accuse people 
of what you don't have the foggiest idea about?



[Back to Top]

Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application