David & Daniel
Apr 23, 2006 08:02 AM
Dear Friends in Theos-talk,
You have below an example of Daniel Caldwell's attacks in his websites against the United Lodge of Theosophists.
In part, I see it as form of propaganda for the ULT -- though involuntary.
It is interesting to note, though, that the name of the author of such an article appears as "David Green". According to Paul Johnson, this is no other than Daniel Cadlwell himself, who impersonates various fake "internet" persons in order to pursuit his own agenda.
The first part of the attack against the ULT, which I reproduce below, ends with a question which David Caldwell or Daniel Green evidently cannot answer. It is the same question in the title.
There are certain things about which "those who know remain silent, and those who talk do not know", as the "Tao Te King" -- the old Chinese book
Daniel and/or David talk about things they obviously ignore.
Best regards, Carlos Cardoso Aveline
Dzyan Esoteric School---
Blavatsky's Esoteric Instructions Issued on Whose Authority?
By David Green
In ULT's Dzyan Esoteric School, esoteric instructions of Madame Blavatsky are reissued to members under a pledge of secrecy. Blavatsky's instructions were not to be discussed or shown to regular ULT associates or to other non-members of the DES. Anyone who violated this oath was expelled from DES.
The essential question to ask is---
On whose authority were Madame Blavatsky's instructions reissued by the DES?
During Blavatsky's & Judge's lifetimes, these instructions were given to new members by the authority of Blavatsky & Judge as Outer Heads of the E.S. directly representing the Masters who were the Inner Heads. Each member took a pledge not to discuss or show the documents to non-members.
Robert Crosbie was an esoteric member during the lifetimes of Blavatsky & Judge. Mr Crosbie had taken the same pledge not to reveal any of these esoteric papers.
After Mr Judge's death & at the formation of the ULT's DES, by whose authority were the instructions reissued with a new pledge of secrecy? Did Mr Crosbie violate his own original pledge by allowing the reissue of Blavatsky's esoteric instructions under a new pledge of secrecy?
It is clear Blavatsky & Judge issued the instructions at the direction of the Masters. Who gave Mr Crosbie the authority or right to violate his original pledge & reissue the instructions to new students under an oath of silence and secrecy?
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Back to Top]
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application