Re: Theos-World Re: Impersonal Suspicions on Daniel
Mar 10, 2006 07:44 PM
Thanks for your reply and comments. You know, I think that you like me
have spent some time just staring at and analyzing many of the old photographs
of the early Theosophists gathered together in London, America, India Ceylon,
and other places. I wondered as I looked at these strangers so displaced in
time and place relative to me here in America and removed by sometimes a century
of time what the uniquely different turbans, headgear, clothing or scantiness
of clothing actually indicated as to caste, clan, rank, tribal affiliation,
religious position and rank, and initiate level. I also was very impressed that
the photo's I looked at communicated the Brotherliness and non-distinctions
iterated in the founding objects. I knew that some of the factions and some of
those gathered together in the old photo's had long standing disaffection's
between them, but here at least that was set aside in the interest of the
Theosophy that Madame Blavatsky and Olcutt had brought to presence, and in which they
participated. Perhaps "Lodges" are the fundamental basic origin of the
problem that bedevils the entire network that is representative of what Theosophy
has become. Lineage's and so forth deprecate original meeting in New York that
formed Theosophy could be a view for the purpose of exteriorization of the
predicament now found. What elements have been the forces in contestation for
right of power and right of direction of Theosophical evolutions?
Was there a "return to Hindu holdership and dynasty?" Where the worldwide
affairs would be directed and controlled from India by Indians?
Was there the entrance of Masonic Dogma and Lodges perfused into original
Theosophy? And continued up until today by holders of dual membership who
force fit the two together and try to make it appear seamless and
indistinguishable? Do people have a right to know what the porridge is composed of?
Has Theosophy possession of sufficient means to permanently exclude any
intrusion by any Political Party or Movement?
What other form of assembly and togetherness would enable a more proper
functional operative efficient means of membership, meetings, friendly concourse
and mutual exchange and interaction than "Lodges" which could not and would
not generate vituperative resentments and protectionist hostilities?
The original idea as I perceive it was that all parties regardless of any
distinction could have assembly, interaction, equal hearing and reception
without equivocation in any form or manner for the purpose of free uninhibited
communication of knowledge, idea, thought, perceptions, origination's,
discoveries, postulations, in a wonderfully free environment called Theosophy without
artificially placed barriers such as rank, office, Degree, Special membership or
other inhibitory creations.
I have seen directly "Precinct Packing" and "District Packing" by
Political Party. It is a dirty obscene drama implemented by holders of power for
self-preservation of perceived necessity, with personal and group magnitudes of
scale. Translated into the Tacoma scene it all brought back memories of vile
political determinations I once witnessed. More than that, what I have read here
posted by Krssanna seems to have propagated to other Theosophy Lodges
elsewhere. When I moved to my current city I made several attempts to have
communication with the advertised Theosophy here and they wouldn't even return a call.
When I finally actually talked to one of them on the phone they wouldn't give an
address or any information about how a new member might join them. This sure
was very strange to me, but now maybe I begin to understand how stifled and
scared the membership might have become internal to their knowledge and how it
become the icy cold clammy hand of death upon the growth at grass roots level of
things. Perhaps a special Poll is necessary and questions that are pointedly
directly configured to determine what fears are held against acceptance of new
members that might place them in a position similar or same to the Tacoma
Recently Carlos stated Paul "Identified" who David Green is. I continue
to hold my own personal view that "Identify" is a misnomer and a faulted
representation. I see where "accusation," "suspicion," "fancy," "rationalizations,"
and other characterization are proposed but if the direct question of the
unerring truth incontrovertible and without any error is asked "Who is David
Green?" a deafening silence must be the response as they have not proven beyond
doubt their "speculations." If all those theosophists who agree with Carlos and
Paul were so many in number then why don't they pass the hat and soon. very
soon they will have the small court fee's required to take it to court and
"Prove" their speculations and "assumptions."
We all see how Politicians, and other have the unwritten law "never accuse
a brother" so does the Mafia and the premise has a very long history of
providing insulation of crimes against mankind and corrupt of the highest order and
magnitudes, Lodges are no different, remember "P2" in Italy, sorry that
simply refuses to wash in my personal mind thank you.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Back to Top]
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application