Why Paul Does Not Clarify
Mar 10, 2006 11:31 AM
by carlosaveline cardoso aveline
Yes, I believe Paul could ber more frank and admit he thinks HPB was a
"Russian Spy", lied,
forged phenomena, etc.
And then he should decide whether the theosophical movement is really his
place to be.
His "maybe policy", though, seems to be slightly outdated by now.
Best regards, Carlos.
From: "Anand Gholap" <AnandGholap@AnandGholap.org>
Subject: Theos-World Defending Paul Johnson from attacks of Blavatsyans
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 11:23:52 -0000
It appears that some people don't like your work 'Masters Revealed'
They are trying to make you go out of talk-lists. Unfortunately you
seem to be surrendering by leaving this theos-talk. And even if you
leave the list, they will try to demean you and your book. So I would
suggest you to stay.
Suppose you don't accept Blavatsky, why do you fear to say so openly ?
It is not necessary that you should accept Blavatsky or anybody else.
TS gives complete freedom to all.
After coming in contact, I soon realized that Blavatsyans have
problematic mental structure which was result of perhaps study of
Yahoo! Groups Links
Copa 2006: Sabe como se diz ‘pênalti’ em alemão? Clique aqui!
[Back to Top]
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application