[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]


Mar 10, 2006 10:19 AM
by carlosaveline cardoso aveline


A Lesson Useful to All of Us:


Carlos Cardoso Aveline


Dear Friends,

Some students of Esoteric Philosolphy now defend H.P.Blavatsky and her teachings from several kinds of disguised attacks.

But the task could be to defend other Truth seekers, if we were in different points in time.

Pythagoras, Socrates, St. John of the Cross, Giordano Bruno, Baruch Spinoza, Alessandro Cagliostro and H. P. Blavatsky all suffered cruel persecution. And they are not exceptions in History: examples are countless. For millenia now, nearly every brave soul who did any important work in favour of mankind has been in one way or another misunderstood and attacked by his contemporaries.

In all such situations Karma has created, as we see right now, the need and the opportunity for students to openly defend these pioneers and teachers. Through solidarity, each learner can preserve and enhance his magnetic link with the source of the spiritual lessons he learns. This preservation and defence – a conscious priviledge for some – is not just individual. It must be also collective. It is not just subjective. It must be objective. It has to be done in the same level of reality in which the attacks happen.

Perhaps the story of an event in the early years of the theosophical movement can illustrate the challenge of defending the Teacher. One day, during the late 1870s, Henry Olcott met in New York an acquaintance with whom he stopped for a few moments to chat. Olcott wrote in his “Old Diary Leaves”:

“The man was very prejudiced against HPB, and he spoke very harshly against her, keeping to his opinion despite all I could say. At last he used such objectionable language that, in sheer disgust, I hastily left him and went on my way.”

A few hours later, when Olcott was at home, a paper was materialized – or precipitated – before him. It was a copy of some aphorisms from the buddhist Dhammapada and Sutras. It came with the signature from one of the Adept-Teachers and a two-words message which simply said – “Translation correct”.

Olcott wrote: “The verses were reproaches to my address for having allowed HPB to be reviled without defending her; unmistakably referring to my encounter down town with a person I had met, although no names were mentioned.” (1)

The importance of this event is that the message from the “Dhammapada” is not just in the past. The message is valid to the students of HPB in the 21st century and in the next centuries as well. As we see Mr. Algeo’s new edition of old forgeries against HPB, the three main paragraphs quoted by the Master and sent to Olcott give us real food for thought. Especially if we acknowledge that the soul of HPB is, in fact, our brother. The paragraphs say:

* “He who hears his brother reviled, and keeping a smooth face leaves the abuse unnoticed, tacitly agrees with the enemy, as if he admitted the same to be proper and just. He who does it is mouse-hearted, or selfishness is at the bottom of his heart. He is not fit to become a ‘companion’.”

* “Revenge is sinful and throws the ‘companion’ in the embrace of Zahak. He who permits his left hand to be polluted with dung without immediately wiping it with his right cares little for the cleanliness of his whole body. What constitutes the integral? – parts. Of what is composed a human body? – of limbs. If one limb cares not for the appearance of another limb, is not Zahak ready with trowel and brush to blacken the whole? Such a ‘companion’ is not ready to become a Brother.”

* “It is easy to destroy the poisonous houâbá in its first germination. It is difficult to arrest its progress when once allowed to mature. Its unhealthy emanations will fill the atmosphere with miasmas It will spread and infect its healthy brethren and cause the limpid waters of the lake to stagnate and dry. Avoid the houâbà and its husbandman, Beloved.” (2)

Unfortunately, this message did not prevent Henry Olcott from making other mistakes along the same line, later on. Yet he had the merit of defending HPB against Mr. V. Solovyovs’ libels, and wrote that Solovyov was “as heartless and contemptible, though fifty times more talented than the Coulombs”. (3)

What can students do, now, about the false accusations against HPB or about various forms of disrespect with regard to the real founders of the theosophical movement and to Theosophy itself? We are not mere spectators: our actions depend on us.

One of the stimulating factors we can take into consideration when we think of HPB is that she is not really dead.

There is no death for a soul like the one who was once born under the name of Helena Petrovna von Hahn. And the work and life-example of such a soul is now, as it will be in the future, an occult and magnetic bridge between mankind and the Elder Brothers.

Hence my sincere congratulations to all those, who, within Theos-talk or outside of it, defend in one way or another their teachers and the sources of their spiritual inspiration, once it is certain that they are unjustly attacked.

The defenders are the first to benefit, at an inner level, from such a defense.

Best regards, Carlos.


(1) Old Diary Leaves, H. S. Olcott, First Series, TPH, Adyar, 1974, 490 pp., see pp. 414-415.

(2) Letters from the Masters of the Wisdom, Second Series, transcribed by C. Jinarajadasa, Theosophical Publishing House, Adyar, Madras, India, 1973. See Letter 23, pp. 47-49.

(3) Old Diary Leaves, H. S. Olcott, Third Series, TPH, Adyar, 1972, 460 pp., see p. 185.

O o o O o o O o o O o o O

Com o MSN Spaces você divide seu blog, suas fotos, sua lista de música e muito mais com seus amigos! Crie já o seu espaço online e com seus amigos! E só entra no

[Back to Top]

Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application