[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Theos-World Re: Impersonal Suspicions on Daniel

Mar 04, 2006 06:39 PM
by samblo

   As you might have noticed by my previous posts I have many of the same 
reflections on what Carlos posts. A few days back one of his compatriots also 
made the statement that of all the other Theosophical Forums there are online 
this Distinguished Forum is the only one that is "unmoderated" and as such has 
the distinct unique character of allowing this muckraking to happen. I suspect 
they have already. previous to entering here, tried to posts this maligned 
content elsewhere and were summarily ejected by the Forum Moderators everywhere 
else in the Theosophical Online Forum World.

   Daniel, contrary to the memory of Carlos just a short time back did post a 
reply to one of Carlos's primary gripes, that he did not in a scholarly 
manner inform readers that the Soloveeff  counterfeit mahatma letters were not 
authentic and in facts false. That the Coulomb's made false lies and statements 
about H.P.B., but Daniel did just that, came here and cited the pages in his 
book where he noticed his readers of these facts, there wasn't then any deception 
on the part of Daniel if he did indeed perform this service to his readers. 
So why does Carlos in such a recalcitrant manner ignore Daniel's citation when 
he is observably able to cite chapter and verse elsewhere? I seem to detect a 
double standard here. 

   G.R.S. Mead in his "Fragments of a Faith Forgotten" long ago divided the 
Book into two primary divisions 1. The Enemies of the Gnosis 2. The Friends of 
the Gnosis by doing this he performed a service to his readers who, many of 
which were unfamiliar with the History, the Groups, the Partisanships, The 
Controversies of the various Parties intimate and inseparable to TRUTH as their 
very existence itself was process of the very stream of Life and Consciousness of 
the Roman Institution of the Church. The Roman Church tried to do the 
selfsame act that Carlos and also the Marxist communists did do, that of exiling the 
facts of TRUE History and supplanting a reductionist faulted distortion and 
monstrosity as the only Authorized Canon of True History. I would hate to have 
to live where only the one truth that some would like to force us to eat 
against our will until some generation will never ever know there was any dissident 
view, that there never ever was any counterfeit mahatma letters, that there 
never ever was the Coloumbs who lied, or any one in the world at all who dared 
to opine the nonparty Line. As I have said before "Boy am I glad to live in 

  It also seems to me that Carlos in pursuing his pet arguments incorporates 
the ULT long-standing disgruntlement about a controversy over the "Lineage 
Holder" William Quan Judge. Where did the Mahatma's or Madame Blavatsky establish 
or instruct anyone to create or install a "Lineage?" In The Buddhist Religion 
the various "sects" hold their "Lineage" most dearly as precious to their 
very existence, without which they are nothing to their genuflection. Is it also 
the express goal and purpose of the ULT to stifle, exile, ban, smother, 
repress, suppress the true actual events, persons and Real History of Theosophy that 
Truly happened? Isn't that the crux of Daniels crime in the eyes of Carlos 
and some others? Perhaps they also hold recriminations because he dared to 
publish the Stokkes Letters with the personal observations of Stokkes who standing 
at the deathbed of William Quan Judge wrote his observations as true as he 
could for posterity. I thank Daniel for doing this service for all of us for 
posterity and the sake of Truth.

  Personally I am cautious about "Lawyers" and have learned to never trust a 
Lawyer, A.P. Sinnett was a Lawyer and so was William Quan Judge. But Madame 
Blavatsky was not!

   Personally I can't distinguish between "Edited and corrected" by Annie 
Besant, C. W. Leadbeater, Alice Bailey,William Quan Judge or others when it 
involves the original Authorship of Madame Blavatsky. My personal druthers is that 
one and all leave it alone, I want to read the "exact original" text she wrote 
as she wrote it. Alter-is is alter-is.
   Maybe if this discussion goes on about Daniel's alleged actions the 
previous post I made about membership of registered Theosophists in America being 
2875 living persons we may seen decline to under a thousand, it wouldn't 
surprise me at all. Then all the Titles and Position so dearly sought after by some 
will have significance only in their minds and no where else, look what they do 
to themselves.

I don't belong to any Lodge my mind is free like a bird and vast like the 
sky, lol.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Back to Top]

Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application