RE: H. Roerich claims Re: A B
Jun 24, 2005 05:12 AM
by W.Dallas TenBroeck
June 24 2005
Thanks Frank and mainly agreed
From: Frank Reitemeyer
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 2:01 PM
Subject: Re: H. Roerich claims Re: A B
don't worry, we have much in common.
We know that no single theosophical lineage has the whole Theosophy.
Each has a part of it; the one a bigger one, the other the smaller one.
But to keep the link unbroken you'll need all parts to complete the puzzle.
That is the reason why party liners are poison for the half-dead TM.
A pukka HPB student will search and find the best, the jewels, each lineage
has to offer.
You know that and I know that (and others).
I fully agree with your comment, I just wrote what the mass (the majority?)
of real existing "Theosophists" in my country (at least) thinks.
They misuse the holy names of HPB's teachers - the helpers of mankind - for
their selfish projections.
It is a shame that the most stupid superstitions could have become
mainstream in theosophical circles (at least here), so that they are merely
sects of bigots, hypocrites and psychics.
And I note as a little researcher that the theos. literature in Germany
before 1945 was of a much higher quality (and quantity!) than since the last
sixty years, including translations.
A rapid degeneration by return, as if someone shifted the switch.
[Back to Top]
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application