Theos-Talk Archives (September 2002 Message tt00190)

In a message dated 09/23/02 9:31:44 PM, micforster@yahoo.com writes:

>Leon wrote:
>> 
>> Thus, both spin and the "cycles" of vibrational
>> energy it generates are the 
>> basis of the wave function or wave forms that
>> determines everything and every 
>> phenomena in the universe. Since these fundamental
>> wave forms are periodical 
>> in nature, their interactions, following the laws of
>> cycles (scientifically, 
>> the laws of electricity, harmonics, resonance,
>> induction, etc.) also appear 
>> periodical on larger and larger harmonic scales.
>> Thus the laws of cycles also 
>> includes the laws of periodicity, and their roots in
>> zero-point spinergy is 
>> the basis of all subsequent physical laws, and the
>> root cause of all 
>> subsequent physical phenomena.
>> 
>
>
>Leon,
>Would this then be akin to a theory of everything that
>physicists are looking for?

It could be, since it is a unified field theory that starts with the 
singularity prior to the big bang, and at the same time doesn't contradict 
any theory of physics -- which are limited to the physical or metric fields 
of the "space-time-continuum." 

Unfortunately, physicists can't accept this theory -- since there is no way, 
using the "scientific method" of objective observation and analysis, to 
reductively verify the nature of the zero-point or the sub-quantum fields 
that it first produces -- which vibrate at frequencies much higher that those 
of the electromagnetic (photonic light) spectrum. The only evidence that 
science has that consciousness exists is subjective. And, so far, subjective 
information is not capable of being used to falsify scientific theories by 
objective means. Therefore, science cannot accept theories such as ABC, or 
its corollary, Theosophical Cosmogenesis, as anything more than "religious 
beliefs" or philosophical speculation.

However, since science still hasn't been able to answer the "hard problems" 
of explaining the origin and nature of consciousness, awareness, thought, 
brain-mind binding, etc., by objective means, they will eventually, as HPB 
predicted -- by a process of elimination of all the wrong assumptions they 
make that attempt to prove consciousness arises as an epiphenomena of matter 
or from the complexity of the brain's neurology -- have to accept our 
holistic view of consciousness and matter as two aspects of one fundamental 
reality. 

The theosophically grounded ABC theory, which now appears to be partially 
verified by the ten dimensional (hyper-spatial) field theory of 
Superstrings/M-branes, can answer ALL the unanswered questions of material 
science related to the study of consciousness/energy and its relationships 
with matter/energy. 

Unfortunately, there is no way that science can accept that awareness and 
intelligence is the fundamental nature of the zero-point and its spinergy -- 
so they will just have to accept it, intuitively, as a fundamental 
proposition, like those of Euclidean geometry. All the rest can easily be 
deduced by current Superstring/M-brane field theory that marries quantum and 
relativity field theories. Hopefully, this will happen soon -- since current 
material science has been waffling over these fundamental questions for the 
past ten years with no sign of a light at the end of their tunnel.

Best wishes, 

LHM