Theos-Talk Archives (August 2002 Message tt00194)

Well these few short sentences are not a "huge body" as you previously 
claimed, by way not even the length of one third of one of the e-mails 
Dallas sends on a daily basis to this list. So that you didn't send a much 
longer just seems like an excuse. 
Reg. your claims:

-The "Big Bang" theory of the origin of the Universe.

-Zero point energy.

Can you explain at least what you mean by these terms ?

And the quotes from Blavatsky to back these up ?

I don't see anywhere in the vocabulary of Isis or SD for example 
mention of the words "Big Bang theory."

And do you have science to back up your religious opinion, reg. "the Big 
Bang theory" and "Zero point energy" the way it is formulated in 
Blavatsky's writings ? 

I'd sure be happy to see it.

Brian

--- In theos-talk@y..., Bart Lidofsky <bartl@s...> wrote:
> brianmuehlbach wrote:
> > Bart: What about the huge body which has been confirmed by later
> > knowledge?
> > 
> > Brian:
> > 
> > 1) Oke pls list this "huge body" for us, so we know what you are 
talking
> > about.
> 
> I don't have the several megs required to send it, so here are 
a few
> highlights:
> 
> 1) The divisibility of the atom
> 2) That that matter and energy were two facets of the same 
thing.
> 3) The "Big Bang" theory of the origin of the Universe.
> 4) The "Steady State" theory of the universe.
> 5) Zero point energy.
> 6) That what we currently call "race" is insignificant.
> 7) That Neanderthal Man is NOT an ancestor of current 
humanity.
> 
> Just to name a few.
> 
> > 2) What is the indication in the SD that any of its exact contents 
> > would derive from Mahatmas in "Tibet" ?
> 
> How is the physical location of the Mahatmas important?
> 
> Bart Lidofsky