Theos-Talk Archives (April 2002 Message tt00011)

samlo (John): Here is a link for a post about the 1st US Patent on 
Zero Point Energy Device awarded to Bearden and his partners."

Bri.: Many poor souls have believed his claims, the claim overunity. 
That implies breaking the first law. Conservation of energy prohibits 
over unity. Why do you need to optimose the materials, even an 
efficiency of 1.000000000001 would be enough, and Naudin claims 
1.75, whilst Bearden claims 5 . The title "Motionless Electromagnetic 
Generator" rather implies an antenna, doesn't it? Isn't this
Hyper-light-speed antenna by D.L.Strom (2000) : US6025810 , the same 
patent that Strom used to show how bad the patent system was?
The thing is a motionless magnetic switch that uses a permanent 
magnet, and the patents cited contain similar devices, many of which 
also incorporate PM's, an motionless switching and generation of 
electricity. But how can a magnetic switch exist, in which there are 
no moving parts, yet in which a permanent magnet can generate energy 
in coils without any mechanical input? And why no announcement to 
nature or science magazine ? Perhaps because of peer review ? Build 
the device and when you find that it doesn't work, then you found out 
something more again.
Br.



--- In theos-talk@y..., samblo@c... wrote:
> Leon,
> Thanks. Btw here are a couple of related events--one about 
Zero-Point 
> Energy
> and another about the recent creation of a 4th State of 
Matter.
> 
> Here is a link for a post about the 1st US Patent on Zero 
Point Energy 
> Device
> awarded to Bearden and his partners :
> 
> <A HREF="http://www.rense.com/general21/free.htm";>MEG Scalar 
Energy 
> Device Patented - Production Starts Next Year</A> 
> 
> 
> 
> and on the newly created 4th State of Matter:
> 
> http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2002/20mar_newmatter.htm