Theos-Talk Archives (February 2002 Message tt00894)

That means you "Monica Suzuki" can discern can discern "a Master's 
signature" in spite of the mediator's style of communication." ?

Of the "messengers" that you know besides Roerich, wich of the many 
hundreds of claimed "messengers of the Masters or the White 
Brotherhood are the genuine ones ? (Alice Bailey, I AM, Bridge of 
Freedom, Ascended Masters groups,UFO messengers groups, Benjamin 
Creme, and so on....)

Bri. 

--- In theos-talk@y..., "redrosarian" <redrosarian@y...> wrote:
> --- In theos-talk@y..., "bri_mue" <bri_mue@y...> wrote:
> > MNS, Do you think "Morya" the claimed author/inspirer of the
> > Roerichs who published letters of "Morya", was the same person as 
> > Blavatsky's "Morya" ?
> > 
> > Or did Roerich just made that up in her mediumistic fervor, the
way 
> > Alice Bailey made up "Master D.K." ?
> 
> To a non-believer regarding any lineage of Theosophy, this might be 
> hard to believe, much less explain to the skeptic. A student of 
> Theosophy can discern a Master's "signature" in spite of the 
> mediator's style of communication although it may be difficult 
> depending on how much of the mediator's personality/ego filters 
> through.
> 
> A medium is a different story. As defined by G. de Purucker, "A 
> medium actually in the theosophical teaching is one whose inner 
> constitution is in unstable balance, or perhaps even dislocated, so 
> that at different times the sheaths of the inner parts of the 
> medium's constitution function irregularly and in magnetic sympathy 
> with currents and entities in the astral light, more particularly
in 
> kama-loka... Very different indeed from the medium is the mediator,
a 
> human being of relatively highly evolved spiritual and intellectual 
> and psychical nature who serves as an intermediary or mediator 
> between the members of the Great Brotherhood, the mahatmas, and 
> ordinary humanity."
> 
> I've seen some pretty good fakes who claim to be the true 
Messengers 
> of the Great White Brotherhood. They were quite familiar with the 
> concept of the seven rays which was explained in further detail by 
> Charles Leadbeater and Ernest Wood. For example, many mediums 
try to 
> imitate the first ray qualities to convince people that they are 
> channeling Morya who is generally accepted as being of the first
ray 
> in many esoteric circles. Lots of people can take the concept of
the 
> seven rays and conjure up their own "Masters" to convince the 
unwary.
> 
> It takes more than a great actor or actress to convince this seeker 
> that one is speaking on behalf of the true Masters. To be a true 
> mediator, it is my understanding that one's consciousness has to be 
> at a certain level of the mental plane. Many mediums are astrally-
> oriented to the point that their so-called Masters seem to take on 
> the very human characteristic of emotional or egotistical
theatrics. 
> It is also my understanding that this method of communication is no 
> longer used by the Masters. Mediumistic communication may have 
been 
> acceptable in the 19th century. However, it would be akin to a 
> person using Morse code to communicate in the 21st century.
> 
> MNS