theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Brigitte on latest parapsychological research and the materialisation con.

Feb 23, 2002 11:47 PM
by bri_mue


Dr. Stephen Braude's book THE LIMITS OF INFLUENCE, and
his first chapter on "The importance of non-experimental evidence" 
does not provide any evidence beyond the existence of certain psychic 
abilities, and some aspects of the Ganzfeld theory that are much more 
up to date explained in Dean I. Radin's book that is much more up to 
date, yet denies the medium/materialisation con as a reality.

Bri.


Through visualization one can see chakras, I can see chakras that way 
to, the 3, 4, 7, 12, or any other system I want to focus on. 

But I am indeed interested to see Daniel to show the results of tests 
done on private individuals under modern laboratory conditions where 
the person in question:

1)Materializes and de-materializes objects as Blavatsky is claimed to 
have done. 

2) Modern laboratory testings where an individual has dissapeared and 
re-appeared at will (without any equipment).

Wich are some of the occurances Daniel Caldwell claims Blavatsly, 
and so on where performing, including making it rain and flowers in 
Olcot's apartment as Daniel claims.
Bri.

PS On the other hand I agree with Dean I. Radin's work on the 
existence of certain psychic abilities, and some aspects of the 
Ganzfeld theory. 




--- In theos-talk@y..., Daniel Caldwell <danielhcaldwell@y...> wrote:
> Brigitte,
> 
> I will let Jerry S. first answer your questions about
> chakras. He is probably much better informed on this
> particular subject than I am. I will add my two cents
> later if I think I can contribute something
> worthwhile.
> 
> But when you write about "results of tests done on
> private individuals under modern laboratory
> conditions", have you read and studied Dr. Stephen
> Braude's book THE LIMITS OF INFLUENCE, especially
> his first chapter on "The importance of
> non-experimental evidence"?
> 
> I ask you this question because Dr. Braude's chapter
> mentioned above is extremely relevant to the issue you
> are raising about test results under modern laboratory conditions.
> 
> =====
> Daniel H. Caldwell
> BLAVATSKY ARCHIVES
> http://blavatskyarchives.com/introduction.htm
> "...Contrast alone can enable us to appreciate things at
> their right value; and unless a judge compares notes and
> hears both sides he can hardly come to a correct decision."
> H.P. Blavatsky. The Theosophist, July, 1881, p. 218.
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
> http://sports.yahoo.com



[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application