theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Daniel Caldwell's harrasments.

Feb 16, 2002 01:02 AM
by bri_mue


Daniel Caldwell: "Do you agree or disagree with Stubbs?"

Steve Stubbs, Paul Johnson, and myself do not want to discuss the 
subjects reg. "Masters visitations" the way Daniel wants to enforce 
it with repeated senseless mails on theos talk.

Steve Stubbs and I as was already reported before in:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/5168

have been discussing this subject since Januari privately, and due to 
the harrasment of Daniel Caldwell plus the attacks by Adelasie not 
anymore on theos-talk. 

Recently we have moved all discussions reg. this and related subjects 
to Universal-Seekers where also Paul Johnson is currently again part 
of this discussion.

Yet in spite of this condition Daniel Caldwell keeps reposting and 
distorting old mails from Steve and myself even our research on these 
subjects has considerable evolved since more then one month ago.

We do not want, to discuss the subject on theos-talk, even if Daniel 
Caldwell posts another 100 provocative mails trying to force me or 
others to discuss certain subjects with him. 

A degree of freedom should be respected on theos-talk but this is 
obviously not the case as I pointed out yesterday already and 
therefore probably never will be the case.

So Paul and Steve are currently having all of there discussions on 
Universal Seekers where Daniel Caldwell does not have access.

Bri.


--- In theos-talk@y..., "danielhcaldwell" <danielhcaldwell@y...> 
wrote:
> Brigitte, you wrote:
> 
> > We would have more peacefull and interresting discussions 
> > that would enrich all if the above where applied. But Daniel 
> > Caldwell's constant harrasment and distortions of the truth 
doesn't 
> > help verry much
> 
> Brigitte, please explain in direct and straightforward language 
> my "distortions of the truth" that you are referring to?
> 
> For example, in my Message at 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/5514
> 
> what did I distort?
> 
> OBTW, why don't you set the record straight by explicitly stating 
> whether you agree or disagree with what both Steve Stubbs and Paul 
> Johnson have written about Olcott's encounters with the Masters. 
If 
> you need to refresh your memory of what they wrote as well as what 
> you wrote, see:
> 
> http://www.blavatskyarchives.com/masterschart.htm
> 
> I'm sure we could have peaceful and interesting discussions of the 
> above. I'm interested in your specific views and even more 
> interested in the thinking and reasoning behind your views, etc. 
And 
> would like to know yours views so that I can compare them with 
> Johnson's and Stubbs' views.
> 
> I will start the ball rolling by saying that my personal views 
about 
> Olcott's encounters with the Masters are similar if not identical 
to 
> what Stubbs writes at:
> 
> http://www.blavatskyarchives.com/mastersstubbs.htm
> 
> Do you agree or disagree with Stubbs?
> 
> Daniel H. Caldwell
> BLAVATSKY ARCHIVES
> http://blavatskyarchives.com/introduction.htm



[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application