Theos-Talk Archives (February 2002 Message tt00303)

Yes it was expected you where going to say something like that giving 
the history of your obsession, but the problem is that there has been 
plenty of evidence that you do not know much about history a such, 
you have never been able to answer any questions in this regards for 
example.

You only seem to own some old magazines and so that you scan into an 
on-line "archive", but that is not enough. As to Paul Johnsons books 
there is plenty of evidence that you are simple dead wrong about the 
contents of Paul's books, period.

You have send the same links of yor dosen or so articles on the 
subject that anybody whoreads TMR can see for themselve that it only 
comprimises 5% of the content of TMR, no matter how often you send 
the same links. 
People caan see they are the same links you are sending over and over 
again Daniel, it is not going to change anything anymore.
Bri.
http://www.unet.univie.ac.at/~a7502210/kpj.html

http://www.unet.univie.ac.at/~a7502210/index.html 



--- In theos-talk@y..., "danielhcaldwell" <danielhcaldwell@y...> 
wrote:
> Dear Brigitte,
> 
> Thanks for your posting at:
>