Theos-Talk Archives (December 2001 Message tt00456)

Daniel: "On a number of occasions since she posted the above, I have 
tried to get Muehlegger to give her views on the Ooton Liatto case."
Daniel must be posting a longer time ago prepared mail today, because 
last week I did comment already on the Ooton Liatto case.
I also note that in spite of posting a significant long essay today, 
Daniel still did not answer the questions he thanked for six days ago 
but did not answer, and to wich today I already added a part V. 

Sorry to say Daniel but are we to believe your knowledge is indeed 
that minimal in regards to TS history ?

Otherwise just finally tell us how and why/why not;

1) Drugs might have been incorporated in the inner 
teachings of the early TS regarding astral travel ?

>From your historical knowledge Pls. explain;

A) Not be true atole? 

B) Part of it true, and if so what part ?

Pls quote evidence in case of A or/and B. Or if you just make it 
up , then pls state so.

2) Did't Blavatsky mentioned (as quoted twice already in my earlier 
mails) "when a sacred beverage enabled him to leave his body' ? 

Did't Blavatsky mentioned the sacred "Sleep of *** " 
an obvious reference to the Sleep of Sialam, a term used by 
P.B.Randolph ?

>From your historical knowledge Pls. explain;

A) Not be true atole? 

B) Part of it true, and if so what part ?

Pls quote evidence in case of A or/and B. Or if you just make it 
up , then pls state so.

3) A whole list of researchers claims drugs where used in the early 
TS.(see my earlier 4 part mail on this subject), do have evidence 
that proof this cannot be true ?

>From your historical knowledge Pls. explain;

A) Not be true atole?

B) Part of it true, and if so what part ?

Pls quote evidence in case of A or/and B. Or if you just make it up 
(your "reasoning"), then pls state so.

4) What about the drugs claimed in the G.H.Felt's 
experiments, and how do you explain these experriments ?

>From your historical knowledge Pls. explain;

A) Not be true atole? 

B) Part of it true, and if so what part ?

>From your historical knowledge Pls quote evidence in case of A or/and 
B. Or if you just make it up , then pls state so.

5) Why would Rawsons report about Blavatsky (She had tried hasheesh 
in Cairo with success, and she again indulged in it in this city 
under the care of myself and Dr. Edward Sutton Smith, who had a
large experience with the drug among his patients at
Mount Lebanon, Syria. She said, 'Hasheesh multiplies
ones life a thousandfold. My experiences are real
as if they wer ordinary events of actual life. Ah!
I have ean xplanation. It is a recollection of my former
existences, my previous incarnations. It is a wonderful
drug, and it clears up a profound mystery."

>From your historical knowledge Pls. explain;

A) Not be true atole? 

B) Part of it true, and if so what part ?

Pls quote evidence in case of A or/and B. Or if you just make it 
up , then pls state so.


.
6) Why would Dr.Santucci state; "Keeping in mind the activities of 
Blavatsky's and her followers in the Lamasry in the New York days, 
are we actually confronted with asociety that was more 
a "theourgia"and less a "theosophia" ?

>From your historical knowledge Pls. explain;

A) Not be true atole? 

B) Part of it true, and if so what part ?

Pls quote evidence in case of A or/and B. Or if you just make it up 
(your "reasoning"), then pls state so.

7)What exactly is your opinion about the various historical issues 
coverred by Mathiesen, and others in my following e-mail ; 

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/4242

>From your historical knowledge Pls. explain;

A) Not be true atole? 

B) Part of it true, and if so what part ?

Pls quote evidence in case of A or/and B. Or if you just make it up 
(your "reasoning"), then pls state so.

Are you not going to send us a list of all the sources mentioned in 
Deveney's small booklet on Astral Projection and the TS soon ? you 
should have seen the World article there, it is listed by Deveney 
there.

If Blavasky stated it herself that she took drugs, then why you keep 
claiming she didn't, or do you now agree she did ?

You ask me to give the sources of the authors I quoted in the above, 
but what is the reason for anybody to even continue the conversation 
with you if your mails so far show a lack of knowledge of your own in 
the subjects you want others to work and provide you with 
information of.
I did already answerred your first request by sending the four part e-
mail quoted above, I certainly am glad to cooperate with you further 
on that if you at least answer the above questions.

Thank you,
Brigitte