Theos-Talk Archives (December 2001 Message tt00279)

Now to try and do me off as a skeptic, where I have always written I 
am not, can only be seen as one of Daniels litle tricks.
In my opinion there is enough scientific evidence , the Ganzfeld 
theory, probably some form of survival after death, and a few others. 
Is what I have stated before. Skeptics do NOT believe the above.

Daniel sofar has only given evidence in the Parapsychological 
research he presented sofar also, only the above has been confirmed.

What is still missing (in spite that it is such incidents Daniel 
wants us to ultimatly believe in) among the information send by Daniel
is conclusive proof of;

1) Materializes and de-materializes objects as Blavatsky is claimed 
to have done. 

2) Modern testings where an individual has dissapeared and 
re-appeared at will (without any equipment).

I also note that Daniel so far has not been able to succesfully 
debunk Steve.
Brigitte



--- In theos-talk@y..., "danielhcaldwell" <danielhcaldwell@y...> 
wrote:
> As a backdrop to our discussions about the paranormal and Madame 
> Blavatsky, there is an excellent article addressing some of the 
> skeptical arguments against the paranormal. I notice that some of 
> these arguments have been hinted at or mentioned by Brigitte 
> M. in her posts to Theos-Talk.
> 
> The article is titled:
> 
> "Debunking Common Skeptical Arguments Against Paranormal and 
Psychic 
> Phenomena"
> 
> By Winston Wu 
> 
> To read this article go to:
> 
> http://www.blavatskyarchives.com/skeptical.htm
> 
> Daniel
> http://hpb.cc