Theos-Talk Archives (November 2001 Message tt00576)

Frank Reitemeyer: "Brigittte, you name me "krank" which means 
something like mental ill, but you address only my lower self"

Brigitte: When did I call you "krank" ?

What I did ask is if you can provide more evidence for the fact that 
as you wrote :

"Didn't HPB warn the public about the Rothschild conspiracy? The US 
FM were degenerated even in 1873-5 when HPB tried toreform it. HPB 
was fighting in London, and from the FM Europe map Steiner published 
were the war aims of WW I were "foreseen" ? "

Brigitte: You are probably right that I don't know of the above as an 
absolute fact becouse I don't know enough about Theosophy.
I only know about Steiners map, but that was a generation afther 
Blavatsky. 

On various places on the imternet it is stated: "Frank Reitemeyer -
Theosophisches Centralarchiv", that is not you ? See for example 
Eldon B Tucker claiming this : 

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahat/message/19

Brigitte

PS Reg. your mail today,I am curious, how reliable is this "Agency 
of Russian Information" ?

From: "Frank Reitemeyer"
Date: Thu Nov 29, 2001 12:35 am
Did Washington know about the World Trade Center attacks in advance? 
by 
G. Shcherbatov 

ARI (Agency of Russian Information), 
Sept. 12, 2001


Translated from the Russian, slightly abridged and modified 


Two years ago, on the eve of the beginning of the 2nd Chechen 
War, when
apartment houses were being blown up in Moscow, evidence surfaced 
that they
might have been blown up not by Chechen terrorists, but by the 
Kremlin, to
create a pretext to declare war. Now some are voicing a similar 
theory in
relation to the recent New York terrorist attacks, i.e., that 
Washington itself
had a hand in them. If this sounds too far-fetched for you, then read 
on. 

Live coverage of the attack was just getting underway in New 
York, and
already we were hearing the words: "Pearl Harbor, Pearl Harbor. It's 
another
Pearl Harbor!" Just how accurate this comparison was could be judged 
by the
cold shiver that ran up my spine and the spines of others who 
remember their
history. 

For consumers of hamburgers raised on the Hollywood version of 
that
tragedy, "Pearl Harbor!" is a rallying cry to destroy the infidels, 
only with
Arabs this time in the role of the Japanese. I can imagine how fat-
bottomed
housewives all over America shed patriotic tears into their popcorn 
at the
sight of those boys singing on the Capitol steps. Those more 
skeptical of
official American propaganda, however, will find the following facts 
to be a
good memory-refresher: 

On December 7, 1941 a surprise Japanese air-attack over Pearl 
Harbor
resulted in 4574 casualties (killed, injured, and missing), 177 
aircraft, two
destroyers, two squadron minesweepers and a lot of smaller vessels 
destroyed.
That day went into US history as a "day of infamy". This has been 
pounded into
the heads of all American schoolchildren for the last 60 years. But 
what's been
beaten out of their heads just as insistently? 

1. On January 27, 1941, the US ambassador in Tokyo informed his
government that "in case of conflict between the United States and 
Japan, the
Japanese intend a surprise attack on Pearl Harbor". 

2. The legendary Soviet agent Richard Sorge informed the Soviet
Government in October 1941 that "the Japanese intend to attack Pearl 
Harbor in
the next 60 days," and received an answer that this information had 
been passed
on to President Roosevelt. (From Sorge's admission, published in 
the "New York
Daily News" of May 17, 1951.) 

3. From September 1941 until the moment of the attack, all 
Japanese
communiques intercepted and deciphered by American intelligence 
pointed to the
impending attack on Pearl Harbor, but they were not passed on to 
local command:
Documents published after the war show that the American base in 
Hawaii was
deprived of all information about the inevitable attack. Even such 
agitprop as
the Discovery Channel is in agreement with this. 

4. On December 1, 1941, the head of the Far East Division of US 
Naval
Intelligence wrote in his report to the commander of the Pacific 
Fleet: "War
between the United States and Japan will begin in the nearest 
future." The
report never reached the commander's desk, because it 
was "accidentally"
detained by his superiors. 

5. On December 5, 1941 Colonel Sadtler from US military 
communications
wrote the following telegram to his command, based on information he'd
received: "War with Japan will begin immediately; exclude all 
possibility of a
second Port Arthur." This telegram was also detained. 

6. The Japanese' answer to Roosevelt's ultimatum, tantamount to 
a
declaration of war, was received by Washington on the 6th of 
December, 1941.
Not a word of this was passed on to the Pearl Harbor command. 

In addition to these incontrovertible facts there are the 
memoirs of
three high-ranking commanders of the US Navy, all participants in the 
events
surrounding Pearl Harbor: Rear Admiral Kimmel, head of the Pacific 
Fleet; Fleet
Admiral Halsey, under Kimmel's command in December, 1941; and Rear 
Admiral
Theobald, commander of the minesweeper squadron at Pearl Harbor. 

>From Kimmel's memoirs: "It was part of Roosevelt's plan that no 
warning
be sent to the Hawaiian Islands. Our leaders in Washington, who 
deliberately
didn't inform our forces in Pearl Harbor, cannot be justified in any 
way. The
Pearl Harbor command wasn't informed at all about ... the American 
note of
November 26, 1941, delivered to the Japanese ambassador, which 
practically
exluded further negotiations and made war in the Pacific 
inevitable.... The
Army and Navy command in the Hawaiian Islands received not even a 
hint about
intercepted and deciphered Japanese telegrams which were forwarded to 
concerned
parties in Washington on the 6th and 7th of December, 1941." 

Fleet Admiral Halsey: "Our intelligence data spoke of a likely 
attack by
Japan on the Philippines or the Dutch East Indies. Although Pearl 
Harbor wasn't
excluded from discussion, everything relayed to us pointed to other 
objects of
attack. If we had known that the Japanese were continually collecting 
detailed
information about the exact location and movements of our warships in 
Pearl
Harbor (which is made clear by intercepted reports), we naturally 
would have
concentrated our efforts on preparations to repel an attack on Pearl 
Harbor." 

Rear Admiral Theobald: "An incontestable fact in the true 
history of
Pearl Harbor is the repeated withholding from Admiral Kimmel and 
General Short
(Navy and Army command in Pearl Harbor, who were later made 
scapegoats for the
catastrophe) of supremely important military information.... There's 
never been
a case in history when a commander was not informed that his country 
will be at
war within a few hours and that his forces will most likely become 
the first
object of attack at sunrise." Admiral Theobald cites the testimony of 
Admiral
Stark (head of Navy Headquarters in Washington, who hid Japan's 
factual
declaration of war from Adm. Kimmel), that he acted on orders from 
above, which
in his case could only mean President Roosevelt himself. The most 
incredible
fact is the withholding of information from Admiral Kimmel. 

Admiral Kimmel and General Short were the lowest links in the 
chain of
command. They were made into scapegoats, as we mentioned above. Both 
were
forced to retire. The highest link in the chain, Roosevelt, died 
within a few
years, taking to his grave other secrets about that war. For example, 
who he
took orders from. Delving into a little history, we can reconstruct a
chronology of events: 

In November 1941 War Minister Henry L. Stimson, after meeting 
with the
presidential administration on November 25, 1941, wrote in his 
diary: "The
discussion was about how we should maneuver to force the Japanese to 
fire the
first shot, while not exposing ourselves to too great a danger; this 
will be a
difficult task. The Japanese air attack on December 7th allowed 
President
Roosevelt to announce to the whole country that the surprise attack 
had put her
in a state of war (note the condition of today's US armed forces: 
delta, in
preparation for war). The "difficult task" had been solved. And 
America, you
see, already had good experience with such "difficult tasks": In 1898 
the
American battleship "Maine" was "sunk by a Spanish mine" in the port 
of Havana.
The rallying cry "Remember the Maine" was used to whip up anti-
Spanish hysteria
in the American population, after which war was declared on Spain. 
Many years
later, when the "Maine" was raised from the ocean floor it was 
established that
the battleship's armor had been blown out by an explosion from inside 
the ship. 

* * * 

The whole world is talking today about the tragedy in America. 
Grief has
come into thousands of homes. Someone at this very moment is 
agonizingly dying
under the rubble. But that's not a tragedy. Just as Pearl Harbor 
paled in
comparison to the American bombings of Dresden, Hiroshima and 
Nagasaki which
followed, the enormity of what awaits us will dwarf the tragedy of 
Pearl Harbor
II. 

The plotters of such mass-murders are not mentally-incompetent 
maniacs of
course. The deaths of thousands in and of themselves are of no 
benefit to
anyone. What's important are the consequences. That's where we'll 
uncover the
real aim of the plotters. We'll be able to get a good idea of who 
organized
this whole nightmare by watching the American leadership's actions in 
the near
future, and its actions will be as follows: 

1. The tragedies in New York and Washington will untie Israel's 
hands for
a full-fledged war against the Palestinians. It's hard to even 
imagine what
turn this could take. 

2. The USA will organize a land-based reprisal operation on the 
territory
of the designated villain. American military men have already 
announced that
it's not worth spending million-dollar missiles to destroy 20-dollar 
tents. If
they decide Bin Laden's the perpetrator, American GI's will soon be 
in Kabul.
The US has a wonderful tradition: once its soldiers have occupied a 
given patch
of the planet as the result of a "peacekeeping" operation, they can 
be smoked
out only by another, opposing peacekeeping operation. By the way, 
from Kabul
one can very conveniently hit Moscow even with tactical missiles. 
Twenty years
ago such a reprisal mission wouldn't have entered anyone's head. We 
would have
answered by landing our paratroopers in California. Maybe that's why 
the Trade
Center towers remained standing all that time? 

Even supposing Russian military brass swallow this all in 
silence, what
about the Chinese? The Afghan mountains offer an ideal position from 
which to
destroy China's intercontinental ballistic missiles at launch (and 
the Yanks
will never let the Chinese get a foothold in the oceans or in space). 
Judging
by the recent quarrels over the American spy plane, the Chinese might 
not be so
"understanding". 

3. Using defense of its citizens against further attacks 
by "outlaw
states" as a justification, the Pentagon will go ahead with a full-
fledged
anti-missile shield. Its space-based lasers can already knock any 
object out of
the sky. Once everything's in place, who will dare to raise their 
voice in
objection? 

4. The introduction of total control over the population will 
help to
prevent further such terrorist acts. Modern computer technology will 
create
changes in society that Orwell couldn't have imagined in his worst 
nightmares.
A microchip fulfilling the role of passport, credit card, universal 
key and
medical card can be sewn under the skin of every citizen. Using this 
chip the
everyone's whereabouts will be known at every moment. "Big Brother" 
may have
other uses for the chip which we "little brethren" will be entirely 
unaware of.
Introducing such measures would raise a hue and cry under normal 
peacetime
conditions, but when airplanes are knocking down skyscrapers and 
subway trains
are exploding citizens will quickly forget about their rights in 
order to
secure the safety of their own behinds. 

In short, the perspectives are quite promising. Just how 
promising we'll
discover soon.