theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

"the sources of Blavatsky wheren't 'Masters' but clearly 'books'"

Nov 26, 2001 08:29 AM
by bri_mue


Oke daniel, in your previous mail you gave your opinion about what 
you think Paul thinks, I doubt Paul will agree with you, in fact the 
first Q/A in Pauls most recent interview easy shows this; 
http://www.unet.univie.ac.at/~a7502210/pjohns.html
However again, with the above you are avoiding to confront the 
information as such below.

Daniel is probably not even capable atole to answer, that is why he 
keeps avoiding the issui of HPB's/Secret Doctrine's sources;

http://www.geocities.com/rewaldsen/blavsynthesis.html

http://www.geocities.com/rewaldsen/mastershbp3.html

http://www.geocities.com/rewaldsen/angelicmaster.html

http://www.geocities.com/rewaldsen/finalyears.html

http://www.geocities.com/rewaldsen/rosicrucianm.html

Brigitte






[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application