"the sources of Blavatsky wheren't 'Masters' but clearly 'books'"
Nov 26, 2001 08:29 AM
by bri_mue
Oke daniel, in your previous mail you gave your opinion about what
you think Paul thinks, I doubt Paul will agree with you, in fact the
first Q/A in Pauls most recent interview easy shows this;
http://www.unet.univie.ac.at/~a7502210/pjohns.html
However again, with the above you are avoiding to confront the
information as such below.
Daniel is probably not even capable atole to answer, that is why he
keeps avoiding the issui of HPB's/Secret Doctrine's sources;
http://www.geocities.com/rewaldsen/blavsynthesis.html
http://www.geocities.com/rewaldsen/mastershbp3.html
http://www.geocities.com/rewaldsen/angelicmaster.html
http://www.geocities.com/rewaldsen/finalyears.html
http://www.geocities.com/rewaldsen/rosicrucianm.html
Brigitte
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application