|
|
| [MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX] |
| [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Jun 05, 2001 02:48 AM
by dalval14
Monday, June 04, 2001 Dear Friends: Let us try and consider what Theosophy has to say about fundamental ideas in practical daily life, and the possibility of our investigating and verifying their accuracy. Using the dictionary to make sure we understand the range and meaning of words is an important first step: CONSCIOUS (--NESS) -- the Dictionary says its roots are: ALONG WITH and TO KNOW. Or to gain knowledge along with others - and exchange information. But there is more: Back to the Dictionary which offers: Additionally, it means SHARING KNOWLEDGE; AWARENESS; SENSITIVITY to INWARD STATE or OUTWARD FACTS; a CONSCIOUS UNIT; SELF-CONSCIOUSNESS; MENTALLY AWAKE or ACTIVE; CRITICAL AWARENESS; INTENTIONAL. It does not state what the CONSCIOUS UNIT is. It seems to always imply INTENTION and AWARENESS. This AWARENESS may be directed inward or outward. It may be critical, or only fact-gathering. It is a mental function. It requires the WAKING STATE for us to direct it. It does not state who or what "WE" are who use it and can direct it. It does not describe what other "states" may be, but recognizes by implication they exist. It does say that the Mind can be directed by the REAL SELF (the "WE") within. "WE" uses and controls the Mind. How do we get to know more about the "WE" in each of us ? Patanjali in his YOGA SUTRAS, indicates that "the Universe exists for the Soul's experience and emancipation." (Pat, pp. 25, 26.) He also indicates that the Soul, when in a body, is conjoined with "the organ of thought." We must assume (using the definitions given by H.P.B. in the KEY TO THEOSOPHY) that by "Soul" the Higher Manas - BUDDHI-MANAS is meant. The "organ of thought" in the body would then be its reflection, or, the Lower Manas - KAMA-MANAS. From that Lower-Manas (the embodied brain-mind) arises misconception, errors of discrimination and choice in action, and Patanjali observes that these bring about future pain (through KARMIC reaction to our choosing). (Pat. p. 21-2.) As to the constitution of the manifested Universe, Patanjali states it is compounded of "purity, action and rest" ( or as expressed in the BHAGAVAD GITA it is Sattva, Rajas and Tamas ) The indication in both books is that the Soul (Higher Manas) "is the PERCEIVER; is vision itself pure and simple; and looks directly upon ideas." (Pat. p. 26) In THE SECRET DOCTRINE, H.P.B. quotes from an occult Commentary ( S.D. I 289) : "There is not one finger's breadth (ANGULA) of void Space in the whole Boundless (Universe)..." Later on (S.D. I 632) she gives an expansion to this concept where she speaks of three distinct "Hosts" ( "Gods," "Monads," and "Atoms") writing, she asks : "Whence the substance that clothes them-the apparent organism they evolve around their centers? The Formless Radiations, existing in the harmony of Universal Will, and being what we term the collective or the aggregate of cosmic Will on the plane of the subjective Universe, unite together an infinitude of monads-each the mirror of its own Universe-and thus individualizes for the time being an independent mind omniscient and universal; and by the same process of magnetic aggregation they create for themselves objective visible bodies, out of the interstellar atoms...." S.D. I 632-3 The Monad is not only a duad (SPIRIT / PRIMORDIAL MATTER) or Atma-Buddhi conjoined, but associated with it is the MIND. Consider that the Mind stands as the ONE CONSCIOUSNESS (wit its roots in the ABSOLUTE) and which is eternally midway between these two primordial Monadic poles, and is the impartial and impersonal WITNESS (Perceiver) Of all changes. Thus the MONAD is triune. Consciousness or awareness and contemplation on any selected subject is innate to it. An old commentary quoted in NOTES ON THE BHAGAVAD GITA pp. 98-100 says in part: "...the One Consciousness...as differentiated in man is his Higher Self [Atma] ...Our consciousness is one and not many, nor different from other consciousnesses. It is not waking consciousness or sleeping consciousness, or any other but consciousness itself. ... The One Consciousness of each person is the witness or spectator of the actins and experiences of every state we are in or pass through. It therefore follows that the waking consciousness of the mind is not separate consciousness. The one consciousness pierces up and down through all the states or planes of Being, and serves to uphold the memory-whether complete or incomplete-of each state's experiences. ''' Then observing the practical side of this knowledge the commentator observes: "The way to salvation must be entered. To take the first step raises the possibility of success...The first step is giving up bad associations and getting a longing for a knowledge of [the Supreme TRUTH]; the second is joining god company. listening to their teachings and practicing them; the third is strengthening the first two attainments, having faith, and continuing in it...." GITA NOTES pp. 98 - 100 Best wishes DTB ============================== -----Original Message----- From: Jerome Wheeler [mailto:ultinla@juno.com] Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 3:45 PM To: sd@blavatsky.net Subject: [bn-sd] What is Consciousness? ================= "Time is only an illusion produced by the succession of our states of consciousness as we travel through eternal duration, and it does not exist where no consciousness exists in which the illusion can be produced; but "lies asleep." (I, 37) ================= If this is so, then the next question would be "What causes the succession of our states of consciousness?" Unless we come to grips with this second question we will, get stuck in the dogmatic position of, "Just do your duty and everything will work out ok." Everyone is silent on the problem of cycles: both scientists and theosophists alike. A pioneering scientist who denies the reality of time becomes very silent about our "changing states of consciousness." In fact, it is usually admitted that they don't know what consciousness is. Barbour does that in his book, The end of time. What does the group think consciousness is?? These "changing states" don't fall like topsy from the clouds, and it looks as if they are quite peculiar to each self-conscious unit. --- You are currently subscribed to bn-sd as: [dalval14@earthlink.net] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-bn-sd-6722509Q@lists.lyris.net