Re: Theos-World Bart's statement
Mar 01, 2001 05:01 PM
by Bart Lidofsky
> In a message dated 2/28/2001 9:41:21 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> firstname.lastname@example.org writes:
> > Well, when one considers that the "secret doctrine" (the doctrine
> > itself as opposed to Blavatsky's book about the secret doctrine) is the
> > correct interpretation of Theosophy, then Blavatsky didn't have it, the
> > Mahatmas didn't have it, and certainly those who came later didn't have
> > it.
> Deeper and deeper we go Bart. How can we know if the actual "secret doctrine"
> is the "correct interpretation" if it's very secrecy, prohibits us from
> knowing anything at all about it?
[Back to Top]
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application