RE: == HPB's use of words.
Jan 23, 1999 05:46 PM
by Dallas TenBroeck
Jan 23rd 1999
Dear Rich: Re: DEVACHAN
We surely are at cross purposes. I repeat: I am not interested
in the philology, and more than "Tony" is according to his latest
We are discussing (so far as I am concerned), not that HPB may be
right or wrong, superficially, in her choice of words, but
whether the meaning behind the words [ in this case "Devachan or
Deva-Chan ] used in Theosophical doctrine are valuable or not.
I brought up the chronology, so far as I am able to trace it, of
the use of this word. I am not interested in linguistics. I
place no special value on them.
No I am not changing the venue at all, in my esteem.
The divergence is what ? Of what lasting value ?
Be content with your view, and let me be happy with mine. Enough
[Back to Top]
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application