Re: RE: ARE WE QUALIFIED TO CRITICIZE H.P.B.?
Jan 05, 1999 01:49 PM
by Jerry Schueler
>I can understand your being annoyed at the constant reference to
>her name by me and some others who reverence her. But that is
>our problem and not yours.
I respect her. You revere her. I think that this is the essential
difference between us.
>By all means put forth your suspicions and doubts. But why not
>frame them as questions? What is it exactly that you suspect or
>doubt? This gives others a chance to respond with those details
>you may not be aware of.
Well, as a matter of fact, Dallas, this is exactly what I thought
I was doing. I have only said that she was plain "wrong" in a
few instances that I am relatively certain are typos. All other
times I simply differ in opinion, and I have always tried to make
that clear. Her teaching on sex (the need for celibacy and chastity)
is not "wrong." It is a valid approach to take, and one that I
simply disagree with personally. I would ask, for example, how
sexual relations could possibly make any difference in one's
spirituality? In fact, I believed we have all discussed this before.
I used to be a convinced Episcopal. Then I became a convinced
Christian Scientist. Then a convinced yogi. Then a convinced
Tantrist. Then a convinced Theosophist. If life has taught me
anything at all it is to always hold fast to doubt and to think for
yourself. I have vowed to never be a convinced anything.
[Back to Top]
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application